Cited by 69Acute Kidney Injury ResearchNephrotoxicity and Medicinal PlantsChronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes

Pathological Significance of a Panel of Urinary Biomarkers in Patients with Drug-Induced Tubulointerstitial Nephritis

Open access
Wu, Yu, Yang, Li, Su, Tao, Wang, Chen, Liu, Gang, Li, Xiao-mei·2010·Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although a renal biopsy is indispensable for depicting the severity of pathologic lesions in drug-induced tubulointerstitial nephritis (DTIN), it is not acceptable in some cases and cannot be performed serially because of its invasive nature. Therefore, the discovery of noninvasive markers that are closely related to the pathology of DTIN is of great value. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: In this study, the urinary levels of monocyte chemotactic peptide-1 (MCP-1), neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), N-acetyl-β-d-glucosaminidase, and α1-microglobulin were measured in 40 DTIN subjects, and the performances of these parameters for distinguishing different pathologic lesions were compared. RESULTS: Linear correlation and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses showed that urinary MCP-1 levels were able to identify serious interstitial edema and inflammatory infiltration with greater accuracy than the other biomarkers (r = 0.501, P < 0.001 and r = 0.768, P < 0.001, respectively), whereas urinary NGAL levels showed the highest correlation coefficient with tubular atrophy (r = 0.692, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that these biomarker levels were higher in patients with DTIN than in controls. Urinary MCP-1 levels correlated and were predictive of the gradated severity of acute lesions in DTIN, whereas the roles of NGAL and α1-microglobulin in chronic alterations require further study.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2215/cjn.02370310

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, Y., Yang, L., Su, T., Wang, C., Liu, G., & Li, X.-M.
Affiliations
  • Peking University First Hospital (CN)
  • Peking University (CN)
Venue
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2010-11
Volume
5
Issue
11
Pages
1954-1959
ISSN
1555-9041 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1964681170
Cited by
69
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Acute Kidney Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Nephrotoxicity and Medicinal Plants
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
Keywords
urinary biomarkers, non-invasive diagnosis, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase, alpha1-microglobulin, interstitial edema, tubular atrophy, inflammatory cell infiltration, renal pathology
MeSH terms
Lipocalin-2, Acetylglucosaminidase, Acute-Phase Proteins, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Alpha-Globulins, Atrophy, Biopsy, China, Female, Fibrosis, Humans, Kidney Tubules, Male, Middle Aged, Nephritis, Interstitial, Predictive Value of Tests, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, ROC Curve, Severity of Illness Index, Biomarkers, Case-Control Studies, Chemokine CCL2, Lipocalins, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review