Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 252

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

North East Italian Prospective Hospital Renal Outcome Survey on Acute Kidney Injury (NEiPHROS-AKI): Targeting the Problem with the RIFLE Criteria

Cruz, Dinna N., Bolgan, Irene, Perazella, Mark A., Bonello, Monica, de Cal, Massimo, Corradi, Valentina, Polanco, Natalia, Ocampo, Catalina, Nalesso, Federico, Piccinni, Pasquale, Ronco, Claudio·2007·Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

Abstract

Acute kidney injury (AKI) in the intensive care unit (ICU) is associated with an enhanced mortality. The Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative group has proposed the RIFLE (Risk-Injury-Failure-Loss-ESRD) classification to standardize the approach to AKI. This study was performed to estimate the AKI incidence in ICU patients in northeastern Italy and describe clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with AKI on the basis of their RIFLE class. A prospective multicenter observational study was performed of patients who fulfilled AKI criteria in 19 ICU in northeastern Italy. Data were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression and survival curve analysis. Of 2164 ICU patients who were admitted during the study period, 234 (10.8%; 95% confidence interval 9.5 to 12.1%) developed AKI; 19% were classified as risk (R), 35% as injury (I), and 46% as failure (F). Preexisting kidney disease was present in 36.8%. The most common causes of AKI were prerenal causes (38.9%) and sepsis (25.6%). At diagnosis of AKI, median serum creatinine and urine output were 2.0 mg/dl and 1100 ml/d, respectively. ICU mortality was 49.5% in class F, 29.3% in I, and 20% in R. Independent risk factors for mortality included RIFLE class, sepsis, and need for renal replacement therapy, whereas a postsurgical cause of AKI, exposure to nephrotoxins, higher serum creatinine, and urine output were associated with lower mortality risk. In this study, AKI incidence in the ICU was between 9 and 12%, with 3.3% of ICU patients requiring renal replacement therapy. Sepsis was a significant contributing factor. Overall mortality was between 30 and 42%, and was highest among those in RIFLE class F.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2215/cjn.03361006

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 252

Metadata

Authors
Cruz, D. N., Bolgan, I., Perazella, M. A., Bonello, M., de Cal, M., Corradi, V., Polanco, N., Ocampo, C., Nalesso, F., Piccinni, P., & Ronco, C.
Venue
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2007-05
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
418-425
ISSN
1555-9041 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2145711589
Cited by
252
References
0
FWCI
13.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: North East Italian Prospective Hospital Renal Outcome Survey on Acute Kidney Injury (NEiPHROS-AKI): Targeting the Problem with the RIFLE Criteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2215/cjn.03361006
The paper
Cruz, D. N., Bolgan, I., Perazella, M. A., Bonello, M., de Cal, M., Corradi, V., Polanco, N., Ocampo, C., Nalesso, F., Piccinni, P., & Ronco, C. (2007). North East Italian Prospective Hospital Renal Outcome Survey on Acute Kidney Injury (NEiPHROS-AKI): Targeting the Problem with the RIFLE Criteria. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. https://doi.org/10.2215/cjn.03361006

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.