The DOI matches its Crossref record.
North East Italian Prospective Hospital Renal Outcome Survey on Acute Kidney Injury (NEiPHROS-AKI): Targeting the Problem with the RIFLE Criteria
Abstract
Acute kidney injury (AKI) in the intensive care unit (ICU) is associated with an enhanced mortality. The Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative group has proposed the RIFLE (Risk-Injury-Failure-Loss-ESRD) classification to standardize the approach to AKI. This study was performed to estimate the AKI incidence in ICU patients in northeastern Italy and describe clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with AKI on the basis of their RIFLE class. A prospective multicenter observational study was performed of patients who fulfilled AKI criteria in 19 ICU in northeastern Italy. Data were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression and survival curve analysis. Of 2164 ICU patients who were admitted during the study period, 234 (10.8%; 95% confidence interval 9.5 to 12.1%) developed AKI; 19% were classified as risk (R), 35% as injury (I), and 46% as failure (F). Preexisting kidney disease was present in 36.8%. The most common causes of AKI were prerenal causes (38.9%) and sepsis (25.6%). At diagnosis of AKI, median serum creatinine and urine output were 2.0 mg/dl and 1100 ml/d, respectively. ICU mortality was 49.5% in class F, 29.3% in I, and 20% in R. Independent risk factors for mortality included RIFLE class, sepsis, and need for renal replacement therapy, whereas a postsurgical cause of AKI, exposure to nephrotoxins, higher serum creatinine, and urine output were associated with lower mortality risk. In this study, AKI incidence in the ICU was between 9 and 12%, with 3.3% of ICU patients requiring renal replacement therapy. Sepsis was a significant contributing factor. Overall mortality was between 30 and 42%, and was highest among those in RIFLE class F.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Joannidis, M., Metnitz, B., Bauer, P., Schusterschitz, N., Moreno, R., Druml, W., & Metnitz, P. G. H. (2009) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-009-1530-4 · Cited by 503
Basu, R. K., Zappitelli, M., Brunner, L., Wang, Y., Wong, H. R., Chawla, L. S., Wheeler, D. S., & Goldstein, S. L. (2014) · Kidney International · doi:10.1038/ki.2013.349 · Cited by 297
Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) versus other fluid therapies: effects on kidney function
Dart, A. B., Mutter, T. C., Ruth, C. A., & Taback, S. P. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007594.pub2 · Cited by 290
Oliguria is an early predictor of higher mortality in critically ill patients
Macedo, E., Malhotra, R., Bouchard, J., Wynn, S. K., & Mehta, R. L. (2011) · Kidney International · doi:10.1038/ki.2011.150 · Cited by 269
Incidence and Etiology of Acute Kidney Injury in Southern India
Krishnamurthy, S., Mondal, N., Narayanan, P., Biswal, N., Srinivasan, S., & Soundravally, R. (2013) · The Indian Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1007/s12098-012-0791-z · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Cruz, D. N., Bolgan, I., Perazella, M. A., Bonello, M., de Cal, M., Corradi, V., Polanco, N., Ocampo, C., Nalesso, F., Piccinni, P., & Ronco, C.
- Venue
- Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
- Published
- 2007-05
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 418-425
- ISSN
- 1555-9041 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2145711589
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: North East Italian Prospective Hospital Renal Outcome Survey on Acute Kidney Injury (NEiPHROS-AKI): Targeting the Problem with the RIFLE Criteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2215/cjn.03361006
- The paper
- Cruz, D. N., Bolgan, I., Perazella, M. A., Bonello, M., de Cal, M., Corradi, V., Polanco, N., Ocampo, C., Nalesso, F., Piccinni, P., & Ronco, C. (2007). North East Italian Prospective Hospital Renal Outcome Survey on Acute Kidney Injury (NEiPHROS-AKI): Targeting the Problem with the RIFLE Criteria. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. https://doi.org/10.2215/cjn.03361006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.