Cited by 275Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthChronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

Effect of Intensive Lipid Lowering with Atorvastatin on Renal Function in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease: The Treating to New Targets (TNT) Study

Shepherd, James, Kastelein, John J.P., Bittner, Vera, Deedwania, Prakash, Breazna, Andrei, Dobson, Stephen, Wilson, Daniel J., Zuckerman, Andrea +1 more·2007·Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

Abstract

Background and objectives Data suggest that atorvastatin may be nephroprotective. This subanalysis of the Treating to New Targets study investigated how intensive lipid lowering with 80 mg of atorvastatin affects renal function when compared with 10 mg in patients with coronary heart disease. Design, setting, participants, & measurements A total of 10,001 patients with coronary heart disease and LDL cholesterol levels of Results Mean estimated GFR at baseline was 65.6 +/- 11.4 ml/min per 1.73 m2 in the 10-mg group and 65.0 +/- 11.2 ml/min per 1.73 m2 in the 80-mg group. At the end of follow-up (median time to final creatinine measurement 59.5 months), mean change in estimated GFR showed an increase of 3.5 +/- 0.14 ml/min per 1.73 m2 with 10 mg and 5.2 +/- 0.14 ml/min per 1.73 m2 with 80 mg (P or = 60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 in significantly more patients and declined to Conclusions The expected 5-yr decline in renal function was not observed. Estimated GFR improved in both treatment groups but was significantly greater with 80 mg than with 10 mg, suggesting this benefit may be dosage related.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2215/cjn.04371206

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 47 · Cited by 275

Authors
Shepherd, J., Kastelein, J. J. P., Bittner, V., Deedwania, P., Breazna, A., Dobson, S., Wilson, D. J., Zuckerman, A., & Wenger, N. K.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Shepherd, James
Venue
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2007-11
Volume
2
Issue
6
Pages
1131-1139
ISSN
1555-9041 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2103477598
Cited by
275
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 27
FWCI
24.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • American Heart Association
  • Pfizer
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Keywords
atorvastatin, intensive lipid lowering, renal function, estimated glomerular filtration rate, coronary artery disease, statin dose, renal protection, LDL cholesterol, dose-response relationship
MeSH terms
Atorvastatin, Adult, Aged, Anticholesteremic Agents, Blood Pressure, Coronary Disease, Double-Blind Method, Female, Glomerular Filtration Rate, Heptanoic Acids, Humans, Kidney, Kidney Diseases, Cholesterol, HDL, Cholesterol, LDL, Male, Middle Aged, Pyrroles, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review