Effect of Intensive Lipid Lowering with Atorvastatin on Renal Function in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease: The Treating to New Targets (TNT) Study
Abstract
Background and objectives Data suggest that atorvastatin may be nephroprotective. This subanalysis of the Treating to New Targets study investigated how intensive lipid lowering with 80 mg of atorvastatin affects renal function when compared with 10 mg in patients with coronary heart disease. Design, setting, participants, & measurements A total of 10,001 patients with coronary heart disease and LDL cholesterol levels of Results Mean estimated GFR at baseline was 65.6 +/- 11.4 ml/min per 1.73 m2 in the 10-mg group and 65.0 +/- 11.2 ml/min per 1.73 m2 in the 80-mg group. At the end of follow-up (median time to final creatinine measurement 59.5 months), mean change in estimated GFR showed an increase of 3.5 +/- 0.14 ml/min per 1.73 m2 with 10 mg and 5.2 +/- 0.14 ml/min per 1.73 m2 with 80 mg (P or = 60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 in significantly more patients and declined to Conclusions The expected 5-yr decline in renal function was not observed. Estimated GFR improved in both treatment groups but was significantly greater with 80 mg than with 10 mg, suggesting this benefit may be dosage related.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Statin trials have not consistently shown renoprotective effects despite moderate triacylglycerol reduction.
“As statin trials have not consistently shown renoprotective effects, despite moderate triacylglycerol reduction [28][29][30]”
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 47 · Cited by 275
- Authors
- Shepherd, J., Kastelein, J. J. P., Bittner, V., Deedwania, P., Breazna, A., Dobson, S., Wilson, D. J., Zuckerman, A., & Wenger, N. K.
- Affiliations
- Emory University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Shepherd, James
- Venue
- Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
- Published
- 2007-11
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1131-1139
- ISSN
- 1555-9041 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2103477598
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 27
- FWCI
- 24.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- American Heart Association
- Pfizer
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Keywords
- atorvastatin, intensive lipid lowering, renal function, estimated glomerular filtration rate, coronary artery disease, statin dose, renal protection, LDL cholesterol, dose-response relationship
- MeSH terms
- Atorvastatin, Adult, Aged, Anticholesteremic Agents, Blood Pressure, Coronary Disease, Double-Blind Method, Female, Glomerular Filtration Rate, Heptanoic Acids, Humans, Kidney, Kidney Diseases, Cholesterol, HDL, Cholesterol, LDL, Male, Middle Aged, Pyrroles, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review