The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ethics in Nanomedicine
Open accessAbstract
As the science and technology of nanomedicine speed ahead, ethics, policy and the law are struggling to keep up. It is important to proactively address the ethical, social and regulatory aspects of nanomedicine in order to minimize its adverse impacts on the environment and public health and also to avoid a public backlash. At present, the most significant concerns involve risk assessment, risk management of engineered nanomaterials and risk communication. Although in vivo animal experiments and ex vivo laboratory analyses can increase our understanding of the interaction of engineered nanomaterials in biological systems, they cannot eliminate all of the uncertainty surrounding the exposure of a human subject to nanomedicine products in clinical trials. Significant risks can still materialize after a product has cleared the Phase I hurdle and is in Phase II or III clinical trials. Furthermore, as the use of engineered nanomaterials in nanomedicine increases, questions of social justice, access to healthcare and the use of nanotechnology for physical enhancement become increasingly important.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nanomedicine in cancer therapy: Challenges, opportunities, and clinical applications
Wicki, A., Witzigmann, D., Balasubramanian, V., & Huwyler, J. (2015) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.12.030 · Cited by 1,901
Targeted polymeric therapeutic nanoparticles: design, development and clinical translation
Kamaly, N., Xiao, Z., Valencia, P. M., Radovic-Moreno, A. F., & Farokhzad, O. C. (2012) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c2cs15344k · Cited by 1,730
Yusuf, A., Almotairy, A. R. Z., Henidi, H., Alshehri, O. Y., & Aldughaim, M. S. (2023) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym15071596 · Cited by 914
Clinical Translation of Nanomedicine
Min, Y., Caster, J. M., Eblan, M. J., & Wang, A. Z. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00116 · Cited by 772
Duggan, S. T., & Keating, G. M. (2011) · Drugs · doi:10.2165/11207510-000000000-00000 · Cited by 234
Metadata
- Authors
- Resnik, D. B., & Tinkle, S. S.
- Venue
- Nanomedicine
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-06
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 345-350
- ISSN
- 1743-5889 (ISSN-L)
- 1748-6963
- OpenAlex
- W2111764722
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ethics in Nanomedicine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2217/17435889.2.3.345
- The paper
- Resnik, D. B., & Tinkle, S. S. (2007). Ethics in Nanomedicine. Nanomedicine. https://doi.org/10.2217/17435889.2.3.345
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.