Cited by 46Epigenetics and DNA MethylationMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumBirth, Development, and Health

Does Maternal Mental Well-Being in Pregnancy Impact The Early Human Epigenome?

Open access
Ryan, Joanne, Mansell, Toby, Fransquet, Peter, Saffery, Richard·2017·Epigenomics

Abstract

There is considerable interest in the potential nongenetic transmission of a suite of mental health conditions across generations, with epigenetics emerging as a candidate mediator of such effects. This review summarizes findings from 22 studies measuring candidate gene DNA methylation and seven epigenome-wide association studies of offspring epigenetic profile in women with adverse mental wellbeing measures (stress, depression or anxiety) in pregnancy. Despite some compelling evidence to suggest an association, there is a lack of reproducible findings, potentially linked to a number of limitations to this research and the field more broadly. Large cohorts with well characterized exposures across pregnancy are now needed. There is exciting potential that epigenetics may help explain some of the link between maternal wellbeing and child health outcomes, thereby informing novel interventions, but future studies must address current limitations to advance translational knowledge in this area.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2217/epi-2016-0118

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is consistent evidence for a link between pregnancy stress (including perceived stress, anxiety, depression, and natural disasters) and increased DNA methylation of NR3C1 in newborns.

    “There is now consistent evidence for a link between pregnancy stress (including perceived stress, anxiety, depression, and natural disasters) and increased DNA methylation of NR3C1 in newborns [55,56], even though the studies have been quite heterogeneous in terms of the type of exposure and tissue investigated (i.e., cord blood, peripheral blood, placenta, buccal swabs).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 126 · Cited by 46

Authors
Ryan, J., Mansell, T., Fransquet, P., & Saffery, R.
Affiliations
Royal Children's Hospital (AU)
Venue
Epigenomics
Published
2017-01-31
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
313-332
ISSN
  • 1750-1911 (ISSN-L)
  • 1750-192X
OpenAlex
W2584013067
Cited by
46
References
126
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2
FWCI
0.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Epigenomics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deakin Research Online (Deakin University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
Keywords
maternal mental health, pregnancy, DNA methylation, transgenerational transmission, maternal stress, maternal depression, maternal anxiety, epigenome-wide association study, candidate genes, child health outcomes
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Mental Health, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Stress, Psychological, DNA Methylation, Epigenesis, Genetic, Embryonic Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review