Gene Therapies: The Challenge of sUper-High-Cost Treatments and How to Pay for them
Abstract
Gene therapies have the potential to cure rare conditions that often have no current efficacious treatments with a one-time treatment episode, relieving substantial unmet need and having profound positive impact on patients' lives. However, with the first gene therapy now licensed and priced at around US$1 million per patient, cost and uncertain funding mechanisms present a potential barrier to patient access. In this article, we discuss the unique challenges presented by gene therapies, particularly concerning the uncertainty inherent in their clinical evidence package at launch and their affordability within strained healthcare budgets. We present several payment models that would allow for sustainable reimbursement of these innovative technologies and make recommendations pertinent both to those developing gene therapies and to those paying for them.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Production costs linked to dual/triple vectors would be double/triple, drastically increasing the already prohibitive prices of gene therapy.
“Lastly, the production costs linked to these vectors would be double/triple, drastically increasing the already prohibitive prices of gene therapy [66].”
From Circumventing the packaging limit of AAV-mediated gene replacement therapy for neurological disorders (2022) · cites this paper as [66]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
HTA methodology and value frameworks for evaluation and policy making for cell and gene therapies
Coyle, D., Durand-Zaleski, I., Farrington, J., Garrison, L., Graf von der Schulenburg, J.-M., Greiner, W., Longworth, L., Meunier, A., Moutié, A.-S., Palmer, S., et al. (2020) · The European Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1007/s10198-020-01212-w · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Marrone, L., Marchi, P. M., & Azzouz, M. (2022) · Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy · doi:10.1080/14712598.2022.2012148 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
“costs linked to these vectors would be double/triple, drastically increasing the already prohibitive prices of gene therapy [66].”
Background
- Authors
- Carr, D. R., & Bradshaw, S. E.
- Affiliations
- Valid Insight, Kemp House, 152 City Road, Islington, London, EC1V 2NX, UK
- Corresponding author
- Bradshaw, Steven E
- ORCID
- Bradshaw, Steven E
- Venue
- Regenerative Medicine
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-05-17
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 381-393
- ISSN
- 1746-0751 (ISSN-L)
- 1746-076X
- OpenAlex
- W2397917110
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 5.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Regenerative Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
- Keywords
- gene therapy, treatment costs, payment models, reimbursement, rare diseases, access to treatment, health budget, drug pricing
- MeSH terms
- Health Policy, Humans, Reimbursement, Incentive, Genetic Therapy, Health Care Costs, Rare Diseases
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review