Cited by 8

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cronología del Estado Inca

Schiappacasse Ferretti, Virgilio·1999·Estudios atacameños

Abstract

Se contrastan sobre la base de un análisis estadístico y algunas consideraciones de naturaleza arqueológica, fechas de radioc arbono y de termoluminiscencia atribuidas al Horizonte Tardío o Inca de las áreas Centro Sur y Meridional andinas, supuestamente más antiguas que la cronología “histórica” generalmente aceptada, con la cronología propuesta independientemente por Adamska y Micheczynski (1996) y por Bauer (1992) para el núcleo del imperio. Se concluye que la cronología del Estado Inca es todavía un problema en discusión que requiere de un mayor acopio de fechados, constituyendo la elección de las muestras y la reevaluación del método de TL, un punto crítico.ABSTRACTRadiocarbon and thermoluminiscense dates of the Late or Inca Horizon from South Central and Meridional andean areas supposed older than the usualy accepted “historie ” chronology are contrasted with the chronology for the heart of the Empire independently proposed by Adamska and Micheczynski (1996) and by Bauer (1992) and supported by a statistical analysis of radiocarbon dates and considerations of archaeological nature. It is concluded that the chronology of the development of the Inca State is until now a problem that require more dates. The simple selection and the revaluation of the TL method is a critical point.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.22199/s07181043.1999.0018.00011

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Schiappacasse Ferretti, V.
Venue
Estudios atacameños
Published
1999-10-05
Issue
18
Pages
133-140
ISSN
0718-1043
Cited by
8
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review