Cited by 33Sexual Assault and Victimization StudiesSocial and Intergroup PsychologyPsychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

GENDER DIFFERENCES IN REACTIONS TO FEMALE VICTIMS

Open access
Drout, Cheryl E., Gaertner, Samuel L.·1994·Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to examine the relationship of gender and level of belief in the just world to reactions to victims. Eighty-six female and sixty-five male college students were led to believe that their partner in a study of work groups was a victim of a sexual assault. A gender difference in the choice of specific justice-restoring strategies was observed. While high just-world males provided significantly more help to victims than controls and low just-world males did not differentiate, female subjects distanced themselves from victims by perceiving them to be less similar to themselves than controls. Findings are discussed in relation to evidence that attempts to restore justice may evoke a multitude of cognitive and behavioral responses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2224/sbp.1994.22.3.267

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A second strategy is to distance oneself from the victim, as a way to reassure oneself that one's own life outcomes can still be governed by fairness principles that ensure bad things only happen to bad people.

    “A second strategy is to distance oneself from the victim, as a way to reassure oneself that even if bad things happened to someone else, one's own life outcomes can still be governed by fairness principles that ensure bad things only happen to bad people (Drout & Gaertner, 1994;Hafer, 2000;Lerner, 1980;Pinciotti & Orcutt, 2021).”

    From Victim blaming and belief in karma (2024) · cites this paper as Drout & Gaertner, 1994

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Drout, C. E., & Gaertner, S. L.
Affiliations
SUNY Fredonia (US)
Venue
Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal
Published
1994-01-01
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
267-277
ISSN
0301-2212 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2080667661
Cited by
33
References
2
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Social Behavior and Personality An International Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Keywords
gender differences, belief in a just world, sexual assault, restoration of justice, social distance, perceived similarity, university students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review