The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A meta analysis study of predictors of disaster victims' post-traumatic stress response based on ecological model
Abstract
본 연구는 재난피해자들의 외상 후 스트레스 장애(이하 PTSD)에 영향을 미치는 변인들을 생태모델을 사용하여 체계적으로 분류하고 그 효과크기를 종합적으로 분석하기 위해 2005년부터 2015년까지 국내외에서 발간된 학술지논문 87편에 대해 메타분석을 실시하였다(N=961). 변인군 별로 PTSD에 대한 효과크기를 비교한 결과, 자연재해의 경우 통계적으로 유의한 효과크기를 보인 변인군 중 상위 세 번째는 ‘가족 내 특성, 가족 및 사회적 관계 관련 스트레스 원, 이차 스트레스 원’ 순으로 나타났다. 변인 별 분석 결과, 자연재해의 경우, ‘가족 내 특성’ 중 ‘기능적 측면’이 큰 효과크기를 보였다. 인재에 있어서 변인군 별로 효과크기를 비교한 결과, ‘노출, 가족 및 사회적 관계 관련 스트레스 원, 이차 스트레스 원’ 순으로 나타났으며, 변인 별 분석 결과, ‘노출’ 중 ‘심리적 거리’, ‘개인 심리특성’ 중 ‘정서반응’이 큰 효과크기를 보였다. 마지막으로 자연재해와 인재에 있어서 각 변인 별로 재난 경과기간과 국가 경제력을 조절변인으로 한 메타회귀분석을 실시하였으며, 조절효과가 유의했던 관련변인이 무엇인지 확인할 수 있었다. 본 연구결과는 재난 심리지원 과정에서 우선적으로 주목해야 할 지표들을 밝힘으로서 임상적으로는 재난피해자들의 심리적 회복을 돕는 개입을 계획하도록 돕고, 정책적으로는 재난 후 정신건강 문제에 보다 취약한 이들이 가진 요소들을 고려하여 국가 차원에서 재난심리지원 방안을 마련하기 위한 근거자료로 제공될 수 있을 것이다.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Recent meta-analyses have been conducted by categorizing variables based on theoretical models to elaborate and increase the explanatory power of the theory used [33,34].”
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Impact of Social Support and Social Trust on Public Viral Risk Response: A COVID-19 Survey Study
Song, E., & Yoo, H. J. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17186589 · Cited by 26
Yoo, H. J., & Song, E. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13179483 · Cited by 27
Choi, E. Y., Choi, S., & Lee, H. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18020698 · Cited by 17
“In particular, the integration of trauma coping capabilities into this factor supports the study’s findings indicating that this factor affects the expression of trauma symptoms [12,24,26].”
BackgroundResultInfluentialPark, H.-J., Shin, Y., & Lee, S. (2023) · Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness · doi:10.1017/dmp.2023.186 · Cited by 10
“25 Moreover, research seeks to apply community resilience in practice, for example, through policies 26 promoting community restoration and the implementation and outcomes of community recovery programs in disaster-affected areas.”
BackgroundChoi, M. J., Kim, S., & Jeong, S. H. (2024) · Asian Nursing Research · doi:10.1016/j.anr.2024.04.007 · Cited by 8
Resilience of young adults in Korea: Navigating the impact of collective trauma and anxiety
Jung, J., Shin, J., & Lee, W. (2024) · International Journal of Social Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/00207640241303023 · Cited by 1
“…such as the individual’s social positioning, the extent of available social support, and cultural and social contexts (Dar et al., 2023; N.-B. Lee & Ahn, 2016), we argue that societal measures such as collective trauma and collective anxiety are important to incorporate in the study of…”
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, N.-B., & Ahn, H.-N.
- Venue
- THE KOREAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY : GENERAL
- Publisher
- Korean Psychological Association
- Published
- 2016-12-31
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 525
- ISSN
- 1229-067X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2597130879
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- 한국심리학회지: 일반 (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
- Keywords
- post-traumatic stress disorder, disaster victims, ecological model, natural disasters, interpersonal stressors, secondary stressors, psychological distance, emotional responses, disaster exposure, disaster mental health services, disaster recovery
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
