The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cancer and Vedic astrology: analysis of planetary configurations, disease-related houses and Vimshottari Dasha
Open accessAbstract
Cancer is a complex group of diseases arising through biological processes involving genetic, cellular, environmental, metabolic and immunological factors. Modern oncology provides the established framework for cancer diagnosis and treatment. Traditional Indian knowledge systems, however, have historically interpreted health and illness through different conceptual frameworks. Vedic astrology, or Jyotisha, is one such traditional system in which planetary positions, houses, planetary relationships, Nakshatras, Dashas and transits are interpreted symbolically in relation to health and life events. This exploratory study presents a structured Jyotish analysis of 15 illustrative cancer profiles, comprising three cases each of Breast, Lung, Oral/Head & Neck, Colorectal and Prostate cancer, anonymised as C01-C15. Each profile is described with plausible but invented demographic and clinical detail (age, sex, city, year of diagnosis, stage/subtype) alongside a standardised Jyotish observation protocol using the sidereal zodiac with Lahiri Ayanamsha, whole-sign houses, D1/Rashi charts, Vimshottari Dasha, Moon Nakshatra and selected planetary relationships. Particular attention was given to the Lagna, 6th, 8th and 12th houses and their lords, together with Saturn, Mars, Rahu and Ketu. Diagnosis-period Mahadasha, Antardasha and Pratyantar Dasha were also examined. The objective was not to statistically test or medically validate astrology, but to identify recurring symbolic configurations across the cases. Across the dataset, Saturn occupies the 6th, 8th or 12th house in 12 of 15 cases; a Rahu or Ketu period is active at diagnosis in 11 of 15 cases; a direct 6th-8th lord relationship appears in all three Lung cases; and two cases (one Oral/Head & Neck, one Prostate) show a complete, closed 6th→8th→12th lord chain. These observations illustrate how a systematic Jyotish case-analysis framework can be constructed and compared across categories.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This exploratory paper presents a structured Jyotish case-analysis protocol applied to 15 illustrative cancer profiles across five cancer categories, using invented demographic, clinical, and astrological data. It reports recurring symbolic configurations—especially Saturn in the 6th/8th/12th and Rahu/Ketu activation at diagnosis—while explicitly stating that the dataset cannot validate astrology or have clinical significance.
Key findings
- Saturn occupies the 6th, 8th, or 12th house in 12 of 15 cases, the most consistently recurring single-planet pattern.
- A Rahu or Ketu period is active somewhere in the Mahadasha/Antardasha/Pratyantar sequence at diagnosis in 11 of 15 cases.
- A direct 6th–8th lord relationship appears in 9 of 15 cases and in all three Lung cases; a direct 8th–12th lord relationship appears in 6 cases.
- A complete closed 6th→8th→12th lord chain appears in only 2 cases, C09 (Oral/Head & Neck) and C13 (Prostate).
Methods
- Exploratory structured Jyotish analysis of 15 illustrative cancer profiles, three each for Breast, Lung, Oral/Head & Neck, Colorectal, and Prostate cancer, anonymised as C01–C15.
- Each profile combines invented demographic and clinical detail with constructed astrological data; no real patients, medical records, or birth records were used.
- Standardised conventions: sidereal zodiac, Lahiri Ayanamsha, whole-sign houses, D1/Rashi chart, Vimshottari Dasha, mean Rahu; observations included Lagna, 6th/8th/12th houses and lords, Saturn, Mars, Rahu, Ketu, Moon Nakshatra, and diagnosis-period Mahadasha/Antardasha/Pratyantar Dasha.
- Analysis was comparative and descriptive, using a four-layer model: natal constitution, disease-related houses, planetary/Nakshatra relationships, and Dasha at diagnosis; no statistical testing was performed.
Limitations
- The paper states that all 15 cases are synthetic profiles created for methodology demonstration, not real patients, and that all astrological data were constructed rather than calculated from real birth data.
- The paper states that the reported numerical frequencies are characteristics of the illustrative dataset and have no epidemiological or clinical significance; the findings cannot be interpreted as evidence that Vedic astrology diagnoses, predicts, causes, or determines cancer.
- The paper states that larger samples, real ethically approved clinical datasets, control groups, verified birth information, and blinded or preregistered procedures would be needed to test whether any configurations occur more frequently than chance.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
28 Own result · 6 No basis given · 4 Own interpretation · 3 Own method
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This axis is most concentrated in the Oral/Head & Neck and Prostate groups.”
plainstates an associationn = 6- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the eighth lord Saturn occupying the sixth house is the defining relationship in C06.”
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“two cases (one Oral/Head & Neck, one Prostate) show a complete, closed 6th→8th→12th lord chain”
plainstates an associationn = 2- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The principal observation from this 15-case exercise is that, even with more clinically detailed and individually varied profiles, no single astrological combination appears in every case.”
plainn = 15- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In each of these cases, one of the relevant lords remains in its own house rather than moving toward another disease-related house.”
plainn = 3- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Complete chain: 6th lord in 8th, 8th lord in 12th, 12th lord in 6th”
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Across the dataset, Saturn occupies the 6th, 8th or 12th house in 12 of 15 cases”
- Also stated in: § 17. Saturn Pattern · plain
“Saturn occupies the sixth, eighth or twelfth house in twelve of the fifteen cases all except C01 (11th house), C14 (5th house) and C15 (11th house).”
plainstates an associationn = 15- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 17. Saturn Pattern · plain
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Mars occupies the sixth, eighth or twelfth house in eight of the fifteen cases: C02, C03, C04, C10, C11, C13, C14 and C15.”
plainstates an associationn = 8- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is the single most frequent house-lord relationship in the dataset”
plainn = 9- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the eighth lord Saturn occupying the sixth house is the single clearest relationship in this chart.”
boostedSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the eighth lord Sun and twelfth lord Jupiter occupy each other's houses, forming a mutual exchange across the 8th-12th axis.”
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is the most dominant temporal (as opposed to natal) pattern observed in the study.”
plainstates an associationn = 11- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“a Rahu or Ketu period is active at diagnosis in 11 of 15 cases”
- Also stated in: § 19. Rahu-Ketu and Diagnosis-Period Dasha · plain
“A Rahu or Ketu period is active somewhere in the Mahadasha/Antardasha/Pratyantar sequence at diagnosis in eleven of the fifteen cases: C01, C02, C03, C04, C05, C06, C08, C11, C12, C13 and C15.”
plainstates an associationn = 11- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § 19. Rahu-Ketu and Diagnosis-Period Dasha · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Only C07, C09, C10 and C14 show no nodal involvement in the diagnosis-period Dasha.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“it is the only relationship present in all three Lung cases”
plainstates an associationn = 3- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A direct 6th-8th lord relationship (in either direction, including the mutual exchange in C03) appears in nine of the fifteen cases: C01, C03, C04, C05, C06, C08, C09, C12 and C13.”
hedgedstates an associationn = 9- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Instead, the cases demonstrate different combinations of disease-related houses, house lords, planetary placements, Saturn, Mars, Rahu and Ketu, Nakshatras, and Vimshottari Dasha.”
boostedn = 15- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“a direct 6th-8th lord relationship appears in all three Lung cases”
hedgedstates an associationn = 3- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Three cases C02, C11 and C14 show no direct lord relationship among the sixth, eighth and twelfth houses under the coding rule used here.”
plainn = 3- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the sixth lord Moon occupying the eighth house is the principal traditional relationship in this chart.”
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Only two cases in the full dataset C09 (Oral/Head & Neck) and C13 (Prostate) show a complete, closed chain in which the sixth lord moves to the eighth, the eighth lord moves to the twelfth, and the twelfth lord returns to the sixth.”
plainn = 2- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is the most consistently recurring single-planet pattern in the dataset.”
plainstates an associationn = 12- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This suggests that a fully connected three-house chain is an unusual rather than a typical finding, even within a dataset constructed to contain a reasonable density of disease-house relationships.”
hedgedn = 2- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The comparison among cancer categories further illustrates the importance of a multidimensional rather than singlecombination approach.”
plainn = 15- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Consequently, the numerical frequencies reported in this article are characteristics of the illustrative dataset and have no epidemiological or clinical significance.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the findings of this study cannot be interpreted as evidence that Vedic astrology diagnoses, predicts, causes or determines cancer.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 10
- Probably not a substantial claim. 8
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the eighth lord Moon sitting in the sixth house, together with the twelfth lord Mars sitting in the eighth, produces two separate direct relationships (6th-8th and 8th-12th) without a complete three-house chain.”
plainstates an associationSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“C10 Colorectal 12th lord in 8th”
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The sixth lord Jupiter occupies the eighth, the eighth lord Venus occupies the twelfth, and the twelfth lord Mercury returns to the sixth a complete, closed 6→8→12→6 chain”
plainstates an associationSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“C12 Colorectal 6th lord in 8th”
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“C11 Colorectal No direct lord chain; 8th-lord own-house strength”
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The lung group is the only one of the five groups in which all three cases show a direct 6th-8th lord relationship, though the specific direction of the relationship (which lord moves into which house) differs from case to case.”
plainstates an associationn = 3- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All three prostate cases involve the eighth house in some form either through a direct lord relationship or through an ownhouse placement of the eighth lord making the eighth house the consistent focal point of this group.”
plainstates an associationn = 3- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Prostate group showed recurring 8th-house involvement, while the Oral/Head & Neck group included an example of the complete three-house chain.”
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Saturn (6th lord) sits in the eighth while Mars (8th lord) sits in the sixth.”
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A direct 8th-12th lord relationship appears in six cases: C01, C04, C07, C09, C10 and C13, including the mutual exchange in C07.”
hedgedstates an associationn = 6- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“C14 Prostate No direct lord chain; 8th-lord own-house strength”
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“C15 Prostate 12th lord in 8th”
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All astrological data (Lagna, house lords, planetary placements, Nakshatra and Dasha) were likewise constructed for illustrative purposes rather than calculated from real birth data.”
plainn = 15- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Each profile combines an invented age, sex, city and diagnosis year with an invented stage/subtype description, so that the case-analysis protocol can be demonstrated in a form that resembles how a real clinical-astrological case file would be structured.”
plainn = 15- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The 15 cases used in this article are profiles created for research-methodology demonstration.They are not real patients, and no real medical or birth records were used.”
plainn = 15- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
The sixth house is traditionally associated with disease and health challenges.
“The sixth house is traditionally associated with disease and health challenges.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The eighth house is traditionally associated with longevity, chronicity, transformation and sudden changes.
“The eighth house is associated with longevity, chronicity, transformation and sudden changes.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The twelfth house is traditionally associated with expenditure, isolation, confinement and hospitalization.
“The twelfth house is associated with expenditure, isolation, confinement and hospitalization.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Lagna and its lord are traditionally examined as indicators of constitution and vitality.
“The Lagna and its lord are traditionally examined as indicators of constitution and vitality.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Traditional Jyotish treats a mutual exchange (parivartana) as a particularly strong two-way relationship between the houses involved.
“Traditional Jyotish treats such an exchange (parivartana) as a particularly strong two-way relationship between the houses involved.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Traditional Jyotish treats own-house placement as a form of planetary strength.
“Traditional Jyotish treats own-house placement as a form of planetary strength”
The paper relies on this without support.
Traditional Jyotish associates Saturn with duration, restriction, delay, chronicity and endurance.
“Traditional Jyotish associates Saturn with duration, restriction, delay, chronicity and endurance”
The paper relies on this without support.
Traditional interpretations associate Mars with heat, inflammation, injury, acute processes and surgical themes.
“Traditional interpretations associate Mars with heat, inflammation, injury, acute processes and surgical themes”
The paper relies on this without support.
The horoscope is interpreted as a representation of constitutional tendencies, vitality, illness, transformation and periods of significant life change.
“the horoscope is interpreted as a representation of constitutional tendencies, vitality, illness, transformation and periods of significant life change.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The invented profiles resemble how a real clinical-astrological case file would be structured.
“so that the case-analysis protocol can be demonstrated in a form that resembles how a real clinical-astrological case file would be structured.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ 16.2 Eighth-Twelfth House Pattern
“A direct 8th-12th lord relationship appears in six cases: C01, C04, C07, C09, C10 and C13, including the mutual exchange in C07.”
§ C13
“C15 12th lord Mars in 8th”
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Papathanassiou M. Iatromathematica (medical astrology) in late antiquity and the Byzantine period. Medicina nei Secoli. 1999;11(2):357-376.
- Prasad GC, Sahu M, Deshpande PJ. Concept of cancer in Ayurveda. Ancient Science of Life. 1982;1(3):172-176.
- Singh RH. An assessment of the Ayurvedic concept of cancer and a new paradigm of anticancer treatment in Ayurveda. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. 2002;8(5):609-614. doi:10.1089/107555302320825108. · DOI
- Sagar SM. Can the therapeutic gain of radiotherapy be increased by concurrent administration of Asian botanicals? Integrative Cancer Therapies. 2010;9(1):5-13. doi:10.1177/1534735409359761. · DOI
- Subedi KP, Thakur B, Neupane P, Baral SK, Poudel LR, Pokhrel C, et al. Cancer-susceptibility from the medical astrological perspective-a case study. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research. 2019;8:1480-1484.
- Kulkarni P. Empirical testing of few fundamental principles of Vedic astrology through comparative analysis of astrological charts of cancer diseased persons versus persons who never had it. International Journal of Applied Research. 2021;7(5):74-85.
- Frawley D. Ayurvedic Astrology: Self-Healing Through the Stars. Twin Lakes, WI: Lotus Press; 2006.
- Tatavarthy BB. Integrated concept of medical astrology and Ayurveda. J Res Educ Indian Med. 2007;11:1-6.
Metadata
- Authors
- Hattangadi, V., & Shinde, S.
- Venue
- International Journal of Jyotish Research
- Publisher
- AkiNik Publications
- Published
- 2026-08-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 09-12
- ISSN
- 2456-4427 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7203574280
- Semantic Scholar
- 6429ac848a693ba36ca4f30a9e96a9e4bcc65572
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Journal of Jyotish Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
- Keywords
- Vedic astrology, Jyotisha, cancer, planetary configurations, Saturn, Rahu, Ketu, breast cancer, lung cancer, colorectal cancer, prostate cancer, traditional Indian medicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-24, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-24 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
