The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multiple comparison test by Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD): Do the confident level control type I error
Open accessAbstract
Examining a huge amount of data is a typical issue in any research process. However, different statistical processes and techniques play essential role to derive a meaningful conclusion from the presented enormous data. Control of type I error is highly essential for a researcher or statistician while dealing with comparisons test with more than two variables. Multiple testing statistical tests provides a structural system and minimizes the error rate by helping to derive meaningful accurate conclusions. Among the different multiple test procedures Tukey's honestly significant difference test (Tukey's HSD) is most common and popular techniques. The main objective of this study was to explore how significantly selection of confidence level or error rate can affect the rate of committing type I error while drawing conclusion. The effect of committing type I error with selection of confidence level or error rate was explored with citing suitable case study in a special education setting. The case study focuses cognitive effect of music on growth and enhancement of the motor behavior (running, jumping and sliding) of children with mild intellectual disability enrolled in the special school setting. ANOVA test was performed and the significance of selection of individual confidence level and simultaneous confidence level) in Tukey’s HSD test was described.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure
(1979) · Scandinavian Journal of Statistics · doi:10.2307/4615733 · Cited by 21,526
Adjusting for multiple testing—when and how?
Bender, R., & Lange, S. (2001) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00314-0 · Cited by 3,004
Encyclopedia of research design
(2011) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.48-2447 · Cited by 1,910
What is the proper way to apply the multiple comparison test?
Lee, S., & Lee, D. K. (2018) · Korean Journal of Anesthesiology · doi:10.4097/kja.d.18.00242 · Cited by 1,052
Some comments on frequently used multiple endpoint adjustment methods in clinical trials
Sankoh, A. J., Huque, M. F., & Dubey, S. D. (1997) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19971130)16:22<2529::aid-sim692>3.0.co;2-j · Cited by 805
A general introduction to adjustment for multiple comparisons
Chen, S.-Y., Feng, Z., & Yi, X. (2017) · Journal of Thoracic Disease · doi:10.21037/jtd.2017.05.34 · Cited by 753
Analysis of Variance: The Fundamental Concepts
Sawyer, S. F. (2009) · Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy · doi:10.1179/jmt.2009.17.2.27e · Cited by 382
Multiple Comparison Procedures
Toothaker, L. (1993) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412985178 · Cited by 340
Multiple Comparisons Procedures
Cabral, H. J. (2008) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.107.700971 · Cited by 309
Pairwise multiple comparison procedures: A review.
Jaccard, J. J., Becker, M. A., & Wood, G. (1984) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.96.3.589 · Cited by 271
Cited by
Toward the dynamic relationship between AI transparency and trust in AI: A case study on ChatGPT
Lee, C., & Cha, K. (2025) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2405266 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Nanda, A., Mohapatra, D. B. B., Mahapatra, A. P. K., Mahapatra, A. P. K., & Mahapatra, A. P. K.
- Venue
- International Journal of Statistics and Applied Mathematics
- Publisher
- AkiNik Publications
- Published
- 2021-01-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 59-65
- ISSN
- 2456-1452 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3123398926
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 22.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiple comparison test by Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD): Do the confident level control type I error. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.22271/maths.2021.v6.i1a.636
- The paper
- Nanda, A., Mohapatra, D. B. B., Mahapatra, A. P. K., Mahapatra, A. P. K., & Mahapatra, A. P. K. (2021). Multiple comparison test by Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD): Do the confident level control type I error. International Journal of Statistics and Applied Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.22271/maths.2021.v6.i1a.636
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.