Cited by 1Second Language Acquisition and LearningEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningReading and Literacy Development

Effects of Implicit and Explicit Instruction on Morphological Awareness and Knowledge

Lee, Meejin, Choi, Sungmook·2020·Studies in English Education

Abstract

In the present study, we explored how implicit and explicit learning affects L2 learners’ morphological awareness and knowledge. To this end, 10th grade high school students (N = 170) in Korea were assigned to one of the three conditions: implicit learning, explicit learning, and control. Participants in the implicit condition learned the meaning of derivatives containing target derivational morphemes (e.g,, sub-) and distractor words, whereas their counterparts in the explicit condition learned the same lexical items and also received morphological instructions. Next, morphological awareness and knowledge was measured by using one- and seven-week delayed post-tests. Overall results revealed superiority of explicit learning over the other two conditions in all post-tests. Results also revealed that although implicit learning may enhance morphological awareness and knowledge to a statistically significant degree, the magnitude of effects computed by Cohen’s d showed small or medium-sized effects. Given that the present study is the first to explore the impact of implicit and explicit learning on morphological awareness and knowledge in EFL settings, the present findings may make important contributions to current second language acquisition literature.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.22275/see.25.1.01

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This study's results support previous research's findings that explicit teaching of words' internal structure in foreign languages helps improve EFL learners' fluency, reading and editing skills, and explicit exposure to morphological structure enables learners to speak and write new words in the target language.

    “Additionally, this study's results support previous research's findings that explicit teaching of words' internal structure in foreign languages helps improve the EFL learners' fluency, reading and editing skills, and explicit exposure to morphological structure enables the learners to speak and write new words in the target language (Khan, 2022;Lee and Choi, 2020;Badawi, 2019).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 31 · Cited by 1

Authors
Lee, M., & Choi, S.
Venue
Studies in English Education
Published
2020-03-31
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
1-20
ISSN
1226-3451 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3015664729
Cited by
1
References
31
Citations by year
2024: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Studies in English Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
implicit learning, explicit instruction, morphological awareness, morphological knowledge, derivational morphology, second language acquisition, EFL learners, morphological instruction, derivational morphemes, delayed retention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review