Effects of Implicit and Explicit Instruction on Morphological Awareness and Knowledge
Abstract
In the present study, we explored how implicit and explicit learning affects L2 learners’ morphological awareness and knowledge. To this end, 10th grade high school students (N = 170) in Korea were assigned to one of the three conditions: implicit learning, explicit learning, and control. Participants in the implicit condition learned the meaning of derivatives containing target derivational morphemes (e.g,, sub-) and distractor words, whereas their counterparts in the explicit condition learned the same lexical items and also received morphological instructions. Next, morphological awareness and knowledge was measured by using one- and seven-week delayed post-tests. Overall results revealed superiority of explicit learning over the other two conditions in all post-tests. Results also revealed that although implicit learning may enhance morphological awareness and knowledge to a statistically significant degree, the magnitude of effects computed by Cohen’s d showed small or medium-sized effects. Given that the present study is the first to explore the impact of implicit and explicit learning on morphological awareness and knowledge in EFL settings, the present findings may make important contributions to current second language acquisition literature.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This study's results support previous research's findings that explicit teaching of words' internal structure in foreign languages helps improve EFL learners' fluency, reading and editing skills, and explicit exposure to morphological structure enables learners to speak and write new words in the target language.
“Additionally, this study's results support previous research's findings that explicit teaching of words' internal structure in foreign languages helps improve the EFL learners' fluency, reading and editing skills, and explicit exposure to morphological structure enables the learners to speak and write new words in the target language (Khan, 2022;Lee and Choi, 2020;Badawi, 2019).”
From Transformative impacts of explicit morphological instruction on irregular inflectional acquisition in Saudi EFL learners (2024) · cites this paper as Lee and Choi, 2020
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 31 · Cited by 1
- Authors
- Lee, M., & Choi, S.
- ORCID
- Choi, Sungmook
- Venue
- Studies in English Education
- Publisher
- Global English Teachers Association
- Published
- 2020-03-31
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-20
- ISSN
- 1226-3451 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3015664729
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Studies in English Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Keywords
- implicit learning, explicit instruction, morphological awareness, morphological knowledge, derivational morphology, second language acquisition, EFL learners, morphological instruction, derivational morphemes, delayed retention
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review