Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 87News Media Framing and Political CommunicationPublic Relations and Crisis CommunicationAcademic Publishing and Open Access

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Press releases -the new trend in science communication

Open access
Autzen, Charlotte·2014·Journal of Science Communication
DOI 10.22323/2.13030302
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Scientific institutions have for a long time known the importance of framing and owning stories about science They also know the effective way of communicating science in a press release This is part of the institution’s public relations. Enhanced competition among research institutions has led to a buildup of communicative competences and professionalization of public relations inside the institutions and the press release has become an integrated part of science communication from these institutions. Changing working conditions in the media, where fewer people have to publish more, have made press releases from trustworthy scientific institutions into free and easily copied content for the editors. In this commentary I investigate and discuss the communicative ecosystem of the university press release. I especially take a close look at the role of the critical and independent science journalist in relation to this corporate controlled communication

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.22323/2.13030302

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. A. Granada (2011), "Slaves to journals, serfs to the web: the use of the internet in newsgathering among European science journalists", Journalism 12(7): 794-813.
  2. B. Trench (2007), "How the internet changed science journalism", in M.W. Bauer and M. Bucchi eds., Journalism, Science and Society. Science Communication between News and Public Relations, Routledge, pp. 133-142.
  3. W. Göpfert (2007), "The strength of PR and the weakness of science journalism", in M.W. Bauer and M. Bucchi eds., Journalism, Science and Society. Science Communication between News and Public Relations, Routledge, pp. 215-226.
  4. M.W. Bauer and J. Gregory (2007), "From journalism to corporate communication in post-war Britain", in M.W. Bauer and M. Bucchi eds., Journalism, Science and Society. Science Communication between News and Public Relations, Routledge, pp. 33-52.
  5. D. Nelkin (1995), Selling science -How the press covers science and technology, W.H. Freemann and Company.
  6. S. Dunwoody (2014), "Science journalism: prospects in the digital age", in M. Bucchi and B. Trench eds., Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, second edition, Routledge, pp. 27-39.
  7. C. Mooney (2011), "Dealing with the U.S. media", in D.J. Bennett and R.C. Jennings eds., Successful Science Communication. Telling It Like It Is, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., pp. 167-181.
  8. R.E. Borchelt and K.H. Nielsen (2014), "Public relations in science: managing the trust portfolio", in M. Bucchi and B. Trench eds., Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, second edition, Routledge, pp. 58-69.
  9. J.E. Grunig (2002), "Two-way Symmetric Relations: Past, Present and Future", in R.L. Heath ed., Handbook of Public Relations, Sage Publications, Inc.
  10. M.C.A. Van der Sanden and P. Osseweijer (2011), "Effectively embedding science communication in academia: a second paradigm shift?", in D.J. Bennett and R.C. Jennings eds., Successful Science Communication. Telling It Like It Is, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., pp. 423-442.
  11. V. Kiernan (2006), "Embargoed Science", University of Illinois Press, Urbana and Chicago, U.S.A. .

Cited by

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Autzen, C.
Affiliations
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Autzen, Charlotte
ORCID
Autzen, Charlotte
Venue
Journal of Science Communication
Publisher
Sissa Medialab Srl
Published
2014-09-22
Volume
13
Issue
03
Pages
C02
ISSN
1824-2049 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.22323/2.13030302
OpenAlex
W2583665279
Cited by
71
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Journal of Science Communication (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › News Media Framing and Political Communication
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Public Relations and Crisis Communication
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Publishing and Open Access
Keywords
press releases, science communication, university public relations, science journalism, corporate communication, communicative ecosystem, media competition, research institutions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.