Cited by 34Education, Achievement, and GiftednessMathematics Education and PedagogyStudent Stress and Coping

Students’ Mathematics Self-Concept, Mathematics Anxiety and Mathematics Self-Regulated Learning during the Covid-19 Pandemic

Open access
Delima, Nita, Cahyawati, Dian·2021·Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika

Abstract

Online learning during the Covid-19 pandemic requires lecturers to provide a stimulus that can increase student learning independence. However, not all lecturers and students are ready to carry out online learning, as a result, the anxiety factor for students is getting higher. In some studies, it is said that anxiety has a negative correlation with student self-concept. This study aims to find out how the mathematics self-concept (MSC), mathematics anxiety (MA), and mathematics learning independence (MSRL) of students are during the Covid-19 pandemic. This research is quantitative descriptive. The population of this study was active students in the Mathematics and Mathematics Education study program. Data were collected using a cross-sectional survey technique with cluster sampling. The data analysis technique used descriptive statistical analysis, Spearman correlation analysis, and ordinal regression analysis. The results showed that the average student had a positive MSC, MA, and moderate MSRL. Students with negative MSC had a significant tendency to have a high MSRL than students with positive MSC. The increasing probability of students with negative MSC having a high MSRL is 0.5110 times better than students with positive MSC. MSC and MA have an effect of 7.9% on changes in the student's MSRL variable. Thus, during the Covid-19 pandemic mathematics self-concept directly affects changes in student learning independence, but not with math anxiety.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.22342/jpm.15.2.13200.103-114

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most studies revealed moderately high mathematics anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic and remote learning.

    “While most studies revealed moderately high mathematics anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic and remote learning (Delima & Cahyawati 2021;Ludwig, 2021), on the other hand, Doz and Doz (2023) found that during the pandemic, the distance learning helped high mathematics anxiety students by reducing feelings of anxiousness.”

    From COVID-19 Impact on College Algebra (2024) · cites this paper as Delima & Cahyawati 2021

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Delima, N., & Cahyawati, D.
Affiliations
  • Universitas Subang (ID)
  • Sriwijaya University (ID)
Venue
Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika
Published
2021-06-30
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
103-114
ISSN
  • 1978-0044 (ISSN-L)
  • 2549-1040
OpenAlex
W3197477145
Cited by
34
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 2
FWCI
6.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
Keywords
mathematics self-concept, mathematics anxiety, online learning, COVID-19 pandemic, mathematics education students, learner autonomy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review