Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 3

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The pathologisation of sexual diversity – a critical scrutiny of the DSM

University of Coimbra, Portugal, Alcaire, Rita·2015·ex aequo - Revista da Associação Portuguesa de Estudos sobre as Mulheres
DOI 10.22355/exaequo.2015.32.10
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.22355/exaequo.2015.32.10

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Alcaire, Rita (2014), «'It wasn't until Google that we found each other': The internet as a primary locus of mobilization for the asexual community», Paper presented for the module on «Scales and Practices of Human Rights: Legalization, mobilization and contestation», PhD in «Human Rights in Contemporary Societies», 1 st semester, 1 st curricular year. American Psychiatric Association (2013), American Psychiatric Publishing, [online] available at http://www.appi.org/SearchCenter/Pages/SearchDetail.aspx?ItemId=2555# [retrieved on 01/02/2014]. ex æquo, n.º 32, 2015, pp. 155-167
  2. Bogaert, Anthony (2004), «Asexuality: Its prevalence and associated factors in a national probability sample», The Journal of Sex Research 41, 279-287.
  3. Bogaert, Anthony (2006), «Toward a conceptual understanding of asexuality», Review of General Psychology 10, 241-250.
  4. Drescher, Jack (2010), «Queer Diagnoses: Parallels and Contrasts in the History of Homo- sexuality, Gender Variance and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual», Archives of Sexual Behavior, 9(2), 427-460.
  5. Goldfried, Marvin; Pachankis, John (2007), «Commentary: Homosexuality -toward affir- mative therapy», in J. Christopher Muran (Ed.), Dialogues on Difference: Studies of diversity in the therapeutic relationship, Washington, APA, 98-106.
  6. Hooker, Evelyn (1957), «The adjustment of the male overt homosexual», Journal of Projec- tive Techniques 21, 18-31.
  7. Moita, Gabriela (2001), Discursos sobre a homossexualidade no contexto clínico: a homossexuali- dade dos dois lados do espelho, PhD Dissertation, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar da Universidade do Porto.
  8. Rita Alcaire ex æquo, n.º 32, 2015, pp. 155-167

Cited by

See all 3

Metadata

Authors
University of Coimbra, P., & Alcaire, R.
Venue
ex aequo - Revista da Associação Portuguesa de Estudos sobre as Mulheres
Publisher
Associacao Portuguesa de Estudos sobre as Mulheres - APEM
Published
2015-12-15
Issue
32
ISSN
0874-5560
DOI
10.22355/exaequo.2015.32.10
Cited by
3
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The pathologisation of sexual diversity – a critical scrutiny of the DSM. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.22355/exaequo.2015.32.10
The paper
University of Coimbra, P., & Alcaire, R. (2015). The pathologisation of sexual diversity – a critical scrutiny of the DSM. ex aequo - Revista da Associação Portuguesa de Estudos sobre as Mulheres. https://doi.org/10.22355/exaequo.2015.32.10

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.