The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The impact of feed additives on the microbial ecology of the gut in young pigs
Open accessAbstract
The diverse collection of microorganisms colonising the healthy gastrointestinal tract of pigs, referred to as the microbiota, plays an essential role not only for the well-being of the animal, but also for animal nutrition and performance and for the quality of animal products.A number of naturally-occurring and artificial factors has been shown to affect the composition and activity of the microbiota in the gastrointestinal tract of pigs, these include: diet composition, growth promoting antibiotics, copper, use of probiotics, specific carbohydrates, organic acids and fermented feed.It is generally accepted that the microbiota in the small intestine competes with the host animal for easily digestible nutrients and at the same time produces toxic compounds.A pronounced microbial fermentation occurs in the stomach and small intestine in young piglets.Results have shown that approximately equal amounts of organic acids were produced in the three compartments: stomach, small intestine and large intestine.Further, experiments have shown that as much as 6% of the net energy in the pig diet could be lost due to microbial fermentation in the stomach and small intestine.On the other hand it has been shown that on a normal Danish pig diet, 16.4% of the total energy supply for the pig is achived from microbial fermentation in the large intestine.However, the microbiota in the gastrointestinal tract is unstable the first week after weaning and it takes 2 to 3 weeks after weaning before the fermentation capacity of the microbiota in the hindgut has developed.Use of growth promoting antibiotics in the feed is widespread in pig production.However, the use of the antibiotics avoparcin and virginiamycin as growth promoters in animal feed has been associated with an increase in resistance of bacteria to therapeutic agents and a fear that this could reduce the ability to treat diseased humans.This has caused an increased awareness of the use of antibiotics and a general wish to reduce the use of antibiotic growth promoters.Probiotics, organic acids and specific carbohydrates (yeast cell walls) are often suggested as alternatives to the use of antibiotic growth promoters.However, due to their relative high prices and the variability and unpredictability of their effect, the use of these products is financially questionable in practical pig production.One way to solve this problem may be the use of fermented liquid feed.Fermented liquid feed is characterised by a high number of lactic acid bacteria, high number of yeast and high concentration of lactic acid, and several investigations has shown fermented liquid FEED ADDITIVES AND MICROBIAL ECOLOGY IN GUT feed to improve growth performance in pigs and to established a prophylactic barrier against gastrointestinal disorders.In general there is no doubt that the effect of feed additives are greatest in young animals where they have been found to improve growth performance and to reduce scouring and neonatal mortality.The present paper review our current state of knowledge about how various feed additives affect the gastrointestinal ecosystem.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Heo, J. M., Opapeju, F. O., Pluske, J. R., Kim, J. C., Hampson, D. J., & Nyachoti, C. M. (2013) · Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition · doi:10.1111/j.1439-0396.2012.01284.x · Cited by 769
Bacillus probiotics: an alternative to antibiotics for livestock production
Mingmongkolchai, S., & Panbangred, W. (2018) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/jam.13690 · Cited by 341
Rist, V. T. S., Weiss, E., Eklund, M., & Mosenthin, R. (2013) · Animal · doi:10.1017/s1751731113000062 · Cited by 269
Lekshmi, M., Ammini, P., Kumar, S., & Varela, M. F. (2017) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms5010011 · Cited by 194
Metadata
- Authors
- Jensen, B.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences
- Published
- 1998-08-22
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- Suppl. 1
- Pages
- 45-64
- ISSN
- 1230-1388 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W964402434
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The impact of feed additives on the microbial ecology of the gut in young pigs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.22358/jafs/69955/1998
- The paper
- Jensen, B. (1998). The impact of feed additives on the microbial ecology of the gut in young pigs. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences. https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/69955/1998
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.