The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.
An Analytical Study to Reveal The Identity of Pharaoh Moses -Peace Be Upon Him- Based on Evidence of Scientific Miracles in The Holy Qur’an and Conclusive Archaeological Evidence
Open accessAbstract
Abstract The goal of completing this research is to reveal the identity of the Pharaoh to whom the prophet Moses - peace be upon him - was sent, with Qur’anic and compelling scientific evidence that would have been impossible to know if God had not revealed them in the Qur’an; It is a historical dilemma that has generated a great controversy among scholars all over the world, including those who deny the existence of Moses in Egypt, the exodus, and the miracle of parting the sea, and those who claim his existence in the sixteenth century, because he was mentioned in the Torah and the Bible, but scientific evidence denies it. In this research, we relied on analyzing the Qur’anic evidence first, then on pure scientific evidence previously discovered, such as translating the papyri and hieroglyphs into English and Arabic; We also relied on good research by Arab and Western scholars as well. The result was unexpected, as they searched in the wrong time and the wrong place; The Pharaoh who challenged Moses - peace be upon him - was the owner of the Great Pyramid: “Pharaoh Khufu,” who ruled Egypt nearly 5,000 years ago, as it is absolutely impossible for anyone to know without inspiration from almighty God, that the minister of this Pharaoh was named “Haman” who was also the chief builder of his monuments according to the evidence found in his tomb that was recently discovered, yet our prophet Muhammad -peace be upon him- mentioned him 14 centuries ago, which confirms the prophecy of our dear Prophet and that the Holy Qur’an was -inevitably- revealed from God Almighty. This research reveals another scientific miracle of the Holy Qur’an, which on its own reveals the time of the existence of Moses -peace be upon him- and the identity of the Pharaoh who defied him, and it also corrects and confirms the period where they lived, supported by undeniable material evidence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Exodus Enigma: Medical Clues to the Pharaoh's Identity
Alfishawy, M. (2025) · Journal of Medical and Health Studies · doi:10.32996/jmhs.2025.6.2.21
Metadata
- Authors
- Bennouar, A.
- Corresponding author
- Bennouar, Assia
- Venue
- International Journal of Quranic Research
- Publisher
- Univ. of Malaya
- Published
- 2024-06-30
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 172-212
- ISSN
- 2289-5396 (ISSN-L)
- 2590-4167
- OpenAlex
- W4415605769
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Journal of Quranic Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Qur’anic Interpretation Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Keywords
- Prophet Musa, Exodus, Khufu, Great Pyramid of Giza, Haman, archaeological evidence, biblical chronology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
