Cited by 17Innovations in Medical EducationHealth and Medical Research ImpactsPrimary Care and Health Outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

A Longitudinal Curriculum for Quality Improvement, Leadership Experience, and Scholarship in a Family Medicine Residency Program

Open access
Pohl, Susan D., Van Hala, Sonja, Ose, Dominik, Tingey, Benjamin, Leiser, Jennifer P.·2020·Family Medicine

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requires all residents be trained in quality improvement (QI), and that they produce scholarly projects. While not an ACGME requirement, residents need leadership skills to apply QI knowledge. We developed the Skills-based Experiential Embedded Quality Improvement (SEE-QI) curriculum to integrate training in QI, leadership, and scholarship. Methods: The University of Utah Family Medicine Residency Program began using the novel curriculum in 2012. The aim of the curriculum is to tie didactic teaching in quality improvement, leadership, and scholarship with skills application on multidisciplinary QI teams. Coaching for resident leaders is provided by faculty. Third-year resident leaders prepare academic presentations. Results of the ACGME Practice-Based Learning and Improvement (PBLI) 3 scores and number of scholarship presentations are described as a measure of efficacy. Results: Two cohorts of residents completed the curriculum and all competency assessments. The average initial and final competency scores for competency PBLI-3 showed improvement and the average final competency for each cohort was above the proficient level. The residency requirements for QI scholarship did not change with introduction of the curriculum, but the amount of optional curricular QI scholarship and independent QI scholarship increased. Conclusions: The SEE-QI curriculum resulted in a high level of resident QI competency, opportunity for leadership training, and an increase in scholarship. We studied the results of this curriculum at one institution. Efforts to tie QI, leadership, and scholarship training should be evaluated at other programs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.22454/fammed.2020.679626

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 16 · Cited by 17

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Butler JM, Anderson KA, Supiano MA, Weir CR. "It Feels Like a Lot of Extra Work": Resident Attitudes About Quality Improve- ment and Implications for an Effective Learning Health Care System. Acad Med. 2017;92(7):984-990.
  2. Neeman N, Sehgal NL. Perspective: a road map for academic departments to promote scholarship in quality improvement and patient safety. Acad Med. 2012;87(2):168- 171.
  3. Hall Barber K, Schultz K, Scott A, Pol- lock E, Kotecha J, Martin D. Teaching Quality Improvement in Graduate Medical Education: An Experiential and Team-Based Approach to the Acquisition of Quality Improvement Competencies. Acad Med. 2015;90(10):1363-1367.
  4. Cheung L. SAFE QI -a framework to overcome the challenges of implementing a quality improvement curriculum into a residency program. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2017;8:779-784.

Metadata

Authors
Pohl, S. D., Van Hala, S., Ose, D., Tingey, B., & Leiser, J. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Utah (US)
  • Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT
Corresponding author
Pohl, Susan D.
Venue
Family Medicine
Published
2020-09-02
Volume
52
Issue
8
Pages
570-575
ISSN
0742-3225 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3081932747
Cited by
17
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6
FWCI
1.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Family Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Keywords
quality improvement education, leadership training, family medicine residency, ACGME requirements, practice-based learning and improvement, faculty coaching, competency assessment
MeSH terms
Curriculum, Education, Medical, Graduate, Family Practice, Fellowships and Scholarships, Humans, Internship and Residency, Leadership, Quality Improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Longitudinal Curriculum for Quality Improvement, Leadership Experience, and Scholarship in a Family Medicine Residency Program. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.22454/fammed.2020.679626
The paper
Pohl, S. D., Van Hala, S., Ose, D., Tingey, B., & Leiser, J. P. (2020). A Longitudinal Curriculum for Quality Improvement, Leadership Experience, and Scholarship in a Family Medicine Residency Program. Family Medicine. https://doi.org/10.22454/fammed.2020.679626