Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 6Educational Technology in LearningSocial Media in Health EducationEducation and Digital Technologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Utilização do Facebook no Contexto Acadêmico: o Perfil de Utilização e as Contribuições Pedagógicas e para Educação em Saúde

Open access
Eyng Possolli, Gabriela, Lincoln do Nascimento, Gabriel, Ollé Mendes da Silva, Juliana·2015·RENOTE

Abstract

O objetivo deste estudo é refletir sobre o uso do Facebook por discentes e docentes e seuspotenciais didático-pedagógicos. Sua utilização em relacionamentos sociais é significativa eseus potenciais educacionais são progressivamente descobertos. Produções científicas acercada relevância desta rede social são recentes, caracterizando um campo que necessitaaprofundamento. Esta é uma pesquisa descritiva, qualitativa, que analisou dados obtidos apartir de um instrumento com questões objetivas e discursivas em que houve a participação dealunos e professores de cursos de graduação na área da saúde de uma IES filantrópica deCuritiba. A amostra compreendeu 35% dos docentes e 55% dos discentes. Dentre osresultados destacam-se que 75% dos participantes utilizam o Facebook mais de 5 dias nasemana e usam seu mensageiro para comunicação, em grupo ou individualmente. 39% dosparticipantes utilizam o Facebook de maneira ativa, como autores de postagens de elaboraçãoprópria, enquanto 61% são mais passivos, curtindo, comentando ou compartilhandopostagens de outrem. Nas considerações finais foram abordados processos da culturaparticipativa, englobando contribuições do Facebook para: afiliação, expressões, circulação esolução colaborativa; e o uso para formação e atuação profissional na saúde.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.22456/1679-1916.57586

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Authors
Eyng Possolli, G., Lincoln do Nascimento, G., & Ollé Mendes da Silva, J.
Venue
RENOTE
Published
2015-08-04
Volume
13
Issue
1
ISSN
1679-1916 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2149168601
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
pt
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
RENOTE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Technology in Learning
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Digital Technologies
Keywords
Facebook, social media in education, health education, university students, university faculty, participatory culture, online communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.