Cited by 26Indigenous Cultures and HistoryIndigenous Peoples' Rights and LawIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Between a rock and a hard place: self-determination, mainstreaming and Indigenous community governance

Open access
Hunt, Janet·2008·Contested Governance: Culture, power and institutions in Indigenous Australia

Abstract

Between a rock and a hard place: self-determination, mainstreaming and Indigenous community governance Janet HuntThe first few years of the new century saw major change in the Australian Government's approach to Indigenous affairs.These developments combined with simultaneous policy shifts in State and Territory jurisdictions to create a period of enormous flux and uncertainty in Indigenous communities and organisations.This chapter aims to help readers understand these changes and the resulting challenges facing the Indigenous community governance bodies involved in our research.Subsequent chapters will indicate that Indigenous people and their organisations actively engaged through this period, trying to manoeuvre their way through these new arrangements towards their own goals.The changes presented opportunities as well as constraints, but this chapter will argue that there is an underlying contradiction that the organisations confront.They are, in a sense, between a rock and a hard place: the assumptions and principles of self-determination underlying the policy environment in which many of them were created have changed.Some new ideas like 'mainstreaming' have been introduced and organisations are finding themselves caught at an uncomfortable intersection between communities operating with one set of assumptions, and governments another.They are also squeezed in the shifting policy space between jurisdictions as different interests exert their influence around them.These organisations are the intercultural space where different 'framings' of the governance challenge (cf.Leach et al. 2007) meet or, at times, collide.At the end of 2007, as this research concluded, a change of government at the national level signalled the potential for a more productive engagement with Indigenous people to address the challenges this paper outlines.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.22459/caepr29.08.2008.02

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Adams, A. 2007. The Individual and Social Transformation: A Critique of the Capability Approach, MA Thesis, ANU, Canberra.
  2. Elu, J. 2007. 'Embracing economic development to achieve economic independence', Paper presented to Tides of Native Title conference, 6-8 June, Cairns.
  3. Johns, G. 2006. 'Social stability and structural adjustment', Paper presented to Leaving Remote Communities, Bennelong Society Sixth Annual Conference, 1-2 September, Sydney.
  4. --with Tracey Whetnall Consulting and Wis-Wei Consulting Pty Ltd. 2006b. Synopsis Review of the COAG Trial Evaluations, Report to OIPC, Canberra.
  5. Pearson, N. 2000. Our Right to Take Responsibility, Noel Pearson and Associates, Cairns, QLD.
  6. --2005b. 'The Cape York Agenda', Speech to the National Press Club of Australia, 30 November, Canberra.
  7. PricewaterhouseCoopers 2007. Living in the Sunburnt Country-Indigenous Housing: Findings of the Review of the Community Housing and Infrastructure Programme, Final report to FaCSIA, February, Canberra.
  8. --2006. 'Indigenous affairs after the Howard decade: an administrative revolution while defying decolonization', Paper presented to the John Howard's Decade conference, 3-4 March, ANU, Canberra.
  9. --2007b. 'From COAG to coercion: a story of governance failure, success and opportunity in Australian Indigenous affairs', Paper presented to the Governing Through Collaboration: Managing Better Through Others conference, Australia and New Zealand School of Government (ANZOG), 28-9 June, Canberra,.
  10. Steering Committee for the Review of Government Service Provision (SCRGSP) 2003. Overcoming Indigenous Disadvantage: Key Indicators 2003 Report, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.
  11. Westbury, N. and Dillon, M. 2006. 'Australia's institutionalised second class', The Australian Financial Review, 8 December.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 26

Metadata

Authors
Hunt, J.
Corresponding author
Hunt, Janet
Venue
Contested Governance: Culture, power and institutions in Indigenous Australia
Publisher
ANU Press
Published
2008-08
OpenAlex
W2211567043
Cited by
26
References
27
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
8.31
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ANU Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Irish College of General Practitioners
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
  • Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Keywords
Indigenous self-determination, mainstreaming, indigenous policy, intergovernmental relations, policy change, intercultural space, policy framing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Between a rock and a hard place: self-determination, mainstreaming and Indigenous community governance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.22459/caepr29.08.2008.02
The paper
Hunt, J. (2008). Between a rock and a hard place: self-determination, mainstreaming and Indigenous community governance. Contested Governance: Culture, power and institutions in Indigenous Australia. https://doi.org/10.22459/caepr29.08.2008.02