The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
METODE PENELITIAN DESKRIPTIF KUALITATIF DALAM PERSPEKTIF BIMBINGAN DAN KONSELING
Open accessAbstract
Jenis penelitian deskriptif kualitatif (QD) umumnya dipakai dalam fenomenologi sosial. Salah satu penelitian sosial adalah penelitian bimbingan dan konseling. Penelitian deskriptif kualitatif dalam perspektif bimbingan dan konseling dapat diartikan penelitian dalam bidang bimbingan dan konseling yang tujuannya untuk menyajikan gambaran detail mengenai setting proses bimbingan atau konseling di sekolah dimaksudkan untuk eksplorasi bagaimana suatu bimbingan atau konseling terjadi, apakah bimbingan atau konseling yang telah dilakukan dapat sejalan untuk mengatasi sejumlah variabel yang berkenaan dengan masalah diteliti. Analisis data dalam penelitian kualitatif dilakukan sejak sebelum memasuki lapangan, selama di lapangan, dan setelah selesai di lapangan. Langkah langkah analisis data kualitatif meliputi reduksi data, display dan penarikan kesimpulan. Kekuatan penelitian kualitatif paling utama terletak dari fleksibilitas dari gaya peneliti untuk mendekripsikan alur penelitian dengan masalah penelitian yang sangat terbuka. Sedangkan kelemahan penelitian kualitatif terletak dari seberapa cermat peneliti menangkap momen ataupun data yang penting pada saat penelitian terjadi.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method
Bowen, G. A. (2009) · Qualitative Research Journal · doi:10.3316/qrj0902027 · Cited by 13,013
(2013) · Cited by 12,072
(2011) · Cited by 7,157
Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches
อุ่นอารมย์เลิศ, ร. ด. ธ. (2016) · Silpakorn Educational Research Journal · Cited by 4,515
Characteristics of Qualitative Descriptive Studies: A Systematic Review
Kim, H., Sefcik, J. S., & Bradway, C. (2017) · Research in Nursing & Health · doi:10.1002/nur.21768 · Cited by 2,243
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH METHODOLOGY IN SOCIAL SCIENCES AND RELATED SUBJECTS
MOHAJAN, H. K. (2018) · Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People · doi:10.26458/jedep.v7i1.571 · Cited by 1,478
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-5971 · Cited by 1,061
An Introduction to Qualitative Research
Bryden, E. (2010) · Sight and Life Magazine: Issue 1/2010 · doi:10.52439/uzxe5427 · Cited by 1,023
Theory and Practice of Group Counseling
Corey, G. (1981) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 743
Complementary Use of Qualitative and Quantitative Cultural Assessment Methods
Yauch, C. A., & Steudel, H. J. (2003) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428103257362 · Cited by 281
Cited by
Saudi Journal of Business and Management Studies
(2019) · Saudi Journal of Business and Management Studies · doi:10.21276/sjbms · Cited by 285
Metadata
- Authors
- Yuliani, W.
- Venue
- QUANTA: Jurnal Kajian Bimbingan dan Konseling dalam Pendidikan
- Publisher
- IKIP Siliwangi Bandung
- Published
- 2018-02-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 83-91
- ISSN
- 2614-2198 (ISSN-L)
- 2614-6223
- OpenAlex
- W3007163975
- Cited by
- 391
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 26.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- id
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: METODE PENELITIAN DESKRIPTIF KUALITATIF DALAM PERSPEKTIF BIMBINGAN DAN KONSELING. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.22460/q.v2i2p83-91.1641
- The paper
- Yuliani, W. (2018). METODE PENELITIAN DESKRIPTIF KUALITATIF DALAM PERSPEKTIF BIMBINGAN DAN KONSELING. QUANTA: Jurnal Kajian Bimbingan dan Konseling dalam Pendidikan. https://doi.org/10.22460/q.v2i2p83-91.1641
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
