The role of research preprints in the academic response to the COVID-19 epidemic
Open accessAbstract
BackgroundThe epidemic of COVID-19 disease originating in Wuhan, China in December 2019 has continued to spread, with global outbreak size currently estimated at 372,757 cases (of which 81,747 occurred within China) \cite{who_novel_2020-2}. Initial concerns about cryptic localised spread have materialised, as human-to-human transmission is confirmed to have occurred within 110 countries \cite{who_novel_2020-2}, with the largest secondary outbreaks since February in Western Europe, the USA, and Iran. The causative virus was identified as a novel betacoronavirus \citep{zhu_novel_2020} and named as SARS-CoV-2 on the 11th February \citep{gorbalenya_severe_2020}.While scientific knowledge surrounding the current public health emergency continues to advance on a daily basis, an important driver in coordinating a research response to the outbreak has been the use of preprints. Uploading unreviewed manuscripts to open-access repositories as preprints can offer immediate knowledge sharing without restrictions from potentially lengthy journal submission and publication processes. Preprint usage can also bring wider benefits to academic research, including further citation potential and a more equitable system of credit for early career researchers \citep{sarabipour_value_2019}. Growth in preprint repositories has surged in the last five years \cite{asapbio_biology_2019}, becoming a more everyday element of scientific literature access and academic culture \citep*{abdill_tracking_2019},…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Despite increased publicity for established preprint review services such as PREreview, there has been a limited use of these platforms.
“Despite increased publicity for established preprint review services (such as PREreview [44,45]), there has been a limited use of these platforms [46].”
From The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape (2021) · cites this paper as [46]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fraser, N., Brierley, L., Dey, G., Polka, J. K., Pálfy, M., Nanni, F., & Coates, J. A. (2021) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000959 · Cited by 555 · see citing works
“Despite increased publicity for established preprint review services (such as PREreview [44,45]), there has been a limited use of these platforms [46].”
BackgroundSelf-citation
- Authors
- Brierley, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Liverpool (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Brierley, Liam
- ORCID
- Brierley, Liam
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-03-25
- OpenAlex
- W3019450662
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
- Keywords
- COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2, preprint servers, open science, knowledge sharing, infectious disease outbreaks, early-career researchers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review