PreprintCited by 6Academic Publishing and Open AccessSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchResearch Data Management Practices

The role of research preprints in the academic response to the COVID-19 epidemic

Open access
Brierley, Liam·2020

Abstract

BackgroundThe epidemic of COVID-19 disease originating in Wuhan, China in December 2019 has continued to spread, with global outbreak size currently estimated at 372,757 cases (of which 81,747 occurred within China) \cite{who_novel_2020-2}. Initial concerns about cryptic localised spread have materialised, as human-to-human transmission is confirmed to have occurred within 110 countries \cite{who_novel_2020-2}, with the largest secondary outbreaks since February in Western Europe, the USA, and Iran. The causative virus was identified as a novel betacoronavirus \citep{zhu_novel_2020} and named as SARS-CoV-2 on the 11th February \citep{gorbalenya_severe_2020}.While scientific knowledge surrounding the current public health emergency continues to advance on a daily basis, an important driver in coordinating a research response to the outbreak has been the use of preprints. Uploading unreviewed manuscripts to open-access repositories as preprints can offer immediate knowledge sharing without restrictions from potentially lengthy journal submission and publication processes. Preprint usage can also bring wider benefits to academic research, including further citation potential and a more equitable system of credit for early career researchers \citep{sarabipour_value_2019}. Growth in preprint repositories has surged in the last five years \cite{asapbio_biology_2019}, becoming a more everyday element of scientific literature access and academic culture \citep*{abdill_tracking_2019},…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.22541/au.158516578.89167184

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brierley, L.
Affiliations
University of Liverpool (GB)
Corresponding author
Brierley, Liam
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-03-25
OpenAlex
W3019450662
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2, preprint servers, open science, knowledge sharing, infectious disease outbreaks, early-career researchers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review