PreprintCited by 8Mass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsProtein Structure and DynamicsProtein purification and stability

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Structural flexibility and heterogeneity of recombinant human glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)

Open access
Gogishvili, Dea, Illes-Toth, Eva, J, Matthew Harris, Hopley, Christopher, E, Charlotte Teunissen, Abeln, Sanne·2023·Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics

Preprint — published as 10.1002/prot.26656 · Paper page

Abstract

Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is a promising biomarker for brain and spinal cord disorders. Recent studies have highlighted the differences in the reliability of GFAP measurements in different biological matrices. The reason for these discrepancies is poorly understood as our knowledge of the protein’s 3-dimensional conformation, proteoforms, and aggregation remains limited. Here, we investigate the structural properties of GFAP under different conditions. For this, we characterised recombinant GFAP proteins from various suppliers and applied hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) to provide a snapshot of the conformational dynamics of GFAP in artificial CSF compared to the phosphate buffer. Our findings indicate that recombinant GFAP exists in various conformational species. Furthermore, we show that GFAP dimers remained intact under denaturing conditions. HDX-MS experiments show an overall decrease in H-bonding and an increase in solvent accessibility of GFAP in aCSF compared to the phosphate buffer, with clear indications of mixed EX2 and EX1 kinetics. To understand possible structural interface regions and the evolutionary conservation profiles, we combined HDX-MS results with the predicted GFAP-dimer structure by AlphaFold-Multimer. We found that deprotected regions with high structural flexibility in artificial CSF overlap with predicted conserved dimeric interface regions. Our results suggest that GFAP exists in several conformational forms. Structural property predictions combined with the HDX data show an overall deprotection and signatures of aggregation in aCSF. We anticipate that the outcomes of this research will contribute to a deeper understanding of the structural flexibility of GFAP and ultimately shed light on its behaviour in different biological matrices.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.22541/au.169645370.02558701/v1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gogishvili, D., Illes-Toth, E., J, M. H., Hopley, C., E, C. T., & Abeln, S.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • LGC Limited
  • LGC (GB)
  • Amsterdam Neuroscience
Corresponding author
Gogishvili, Dea
Venue
Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-10-04
Volume
92
Issue
5
Pages
649-664
ISSN
0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4390269103
Cited by
8
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Alzheimer's Association
  • Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation
  • European Commission (860197)
  • ZonMw
  • Alzheimer Nederland
  • Selfridges Group Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein purification and stability
Keywords
glial fibrillary acidic protein, protein conformational dynamics, structural heterogeneity, recombinant protein, hydrogen-deuterium exchange, artificial cerebrospinal fluid, protein aggregation, solvent accessibility, hydrogen bonding, dimer interface
MeSH terms
Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, Humans, Phosphates, Protein Conformation, Recombinant Proteins, Reproducibility of Results, Deuterium Exchange Measurement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review