PreprintCited by 3vaccines and immunoinformatics approachesTuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyImmunotherapy and Immune Responses

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bioinformatics analysis and immunogenicity assessment of the novel multi-stage DNA vaccine W541 against Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1002/iid3.70074 · Paper page

Abstract

Background: Vaccination is one of the effective measures to prevent latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) from developing into active tuberculosis (TB). Applying bioinformatics methods to pre-evaluate the biological characteristics and immunogenicity of vaccines can improve the efficiency of vaccine development. Objectives: To evaluate the immunogenicity of tuberculosis vaccine W541 and explore the application of bioinformatics technology in tuberculosis vaccine research. Methods: This study concatenated the immunodominant sequences of Ag85A, Ag85B, Rv3407, and Rv1733c to construct the W541 DNA vaccine. Then, bioinformatics methods were used to analyze the physicochemical properties, antigenicity, allergenicity, toxicity, and population coverage of the vaccine, identify its epitopes, and perform molecular docking with MHC alleles and Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) of the host. Finally, the immunogenicity of the vaccine was evaluated through animal experiments. Results: the W541 vaccine protein is a soluble cytoplasmic protein with a half-life of 1.1 hours in vivo and an instability index of 45.37. It has good antigenicity and wide population coverage without allergenicity and toxicity. It contains 138 HTL epitopes, 73 CTL epitopes, 8 linear and 14 discontinuous epitopes of B cells, and a strong affinity for TLR4. Immune simulations showed it could effectively stimulate innate and adaptive immune responses. Animal experiments have confirmed that the W541 DNA vaccine could effectively activate the Th1- and Th17-type immune responses, producing high levels of IFN-γ and IL-17A, but could not significantly increase antibody levels. Conclusion: the W541 DNA vaccine can induce strong cellular immune responses. However, further optimization of the vaccine design is needed to make the expressed protein more stable in vivo. Bioinformatics analysis could reveal vaccines’ physicochemical and immunological information, which is critical for guiding vaccine design and development.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.22541/au.171405055.56084261/v1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Metadata

Authors
Yang, Y., Liang, Y., Xue, Y., Wang, X., Wang, L., Wang, J., Zhang, J., & Wu, X.
Affiliations
Chinese PLA General Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Liang, Yan
  • Wu, Xueqiong
Venue
Immunity Inflammation and Disease
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-04-25
Volume
12
Issue
11
Pages
e70074-e70074
ISSN
2050-4527 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4404717200
Cited by
3
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Immunity Inflammation and Disease (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
General Hospital of People’s Liberation Army
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
Keywords
tuberculosis vaccine, DNA vaccine, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Ag85A, Ag85B, immunogenicity, epitope prediction, B-cell epitopes, CTL epitopes, TLR4, MHC binding, Th1/Th17 response, latent tuberculosis infection, vaccine design
MeSH terms
Immunogenicity, Vaccine, Animals, Antigens, Bacterial, Female, Humans, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Tuberculosis, Epitopes, T-Lymphocyte, Epitopes, B-Lymphocyte, Computational Biology, Vaccines, DNA, Tuberculosis Vaccines, Mice, Molecular Docking Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review