Silicate weathering in marine sediments: processes, governing factors, and role in global elemental cycles
Abstract
not-yet-known not-yet-known not-yet-known unknown Silicate weathering occurs across marine sediments with a spectrum of reaction balances and fluxes, influencing seawater chemistry and carbon cycling on long timescales. Fluxes range from net alkalinity and cation consumption (‘reverse’ weathering) to net alkalinity and cation release (‘forward’ weathering), varying across depositional environments and locally with depth and time. Here, we review the research history, mechanisms and biogeochemistry of silicate weathering in marine sediments. We then examine the distribution of marine sediment sources (reactants), depositional environments (biogeochemical, physical), and authigenic mineral suites (products) from the coast to the deep sea to assemble representative reaction balances and rate estimates. Permeable sediments, deltaic mobile muds, steady anoxic muds, deep-sea clays and carbonate oozes together constitute significant global fluxes with vastly different reaction balances, rates and sensitivities. These fluxes appear to net reduce alkalinity generation (~ - 30 %), but augment authigenic carbonate burial (~ + 10 %) associated with terrestrial silicate weathering today. A new set of modern oceanic budgets, embracing the coupling of Si, K, Mg, Ca, and alkalinity, suggests those cycles to be close to steady state (≤ + 25 % imbalance for Si and alkalinity) and ~ 20 – 50% faster. This continuum of weathering environments has evolved with magmatism and tectonics, climate and…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sediments can be a significant source of dissolved alkalinity to the water column, due in part to dissolution of carbonate minerals.
“Sediments can be a significant source of dissolved alkalinity to the water column, due in part to dissolution of carbonate minerals. 67-69”
From A framework for understanding efficiency losses of Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement (2026) · cites this paper as [69]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A framework for understanding efficiency losses of Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement
Lunstrum, A., Keller, D., Hartmann, J., & Moras, C. (2026) · CDRxiv · doi:10.70212/cdrxiv.2026517.v1 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Trapp-Müller, G., Aller, R. C., Sluijs, A., & Middelburg, J. J.
- Affiliations
- Utrecht University
- Stony Brook University (US)
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2026-02-05
- OpenAlex
- W7127910399
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
- Keywords
- silicate weathering, marine sediment, reverse weathering, authigenic carbonates, alkalinity, silicon cycle, potassium cycle, calcium cycle, carbonate ooze, reaction balance, carbon cycle, geoengineering, Earth system resilience
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review