The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multiple mini-interview scores of medical school applicants with and without rural attributes
Open accessAbstract
INTRODUCTION: Students from rural areas are under-represented in medical schools. Concerns have been raised about rural applicants' qualifications relative to those of their urban counterparts, and the impact such potential differences in competitiveness may have on their under-representation. Although studies have reported no differences in Grade Point Average (GPA) and Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) scores between applicants with and without rural attributes, to date no study has assessed if performance on the multiple mini-interview (MMI) varies between the two groups. METHODS: The MMI scores of 1257 interviewees for admission to the MD program at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Manitoba, in years 2008 to 2011, were studied for an association with graduation from a rural high school and attributes in the following three domains: rural connections, employment in rural areas, and rural community service. RESULTS: There were 205 (16.3%) rural high school graduates among interviewed applicants. Rural high school graduates scored significantly lower (mean of 4.4 on a scale of 1 to 7; p < 0.05) than urban high school graduates (4.6). Among rural-attribute domains, those with rural community service alone had the highest MMI scores (4.9) while those with rural connections alone had the lowest scores (4.3; p = 0.016). After adjusting for demographics, GPA, and MCAT scores in a multiple linear regression model, rural-attribute domains were not significant predictors of an applicant's MMI score. However, graduation from a rural high school was significantly associated with decreased MMI scores (a 0.122 decrease in predicted MMI scores on a scale of 1 to 7). CONCLUSION: Despite graduates from rural and urban high schools having comparable GPA, there exists a rural-urban divide in MMI scores that could exacerbate the under-representation of rural students in medical schools. Aboriginal applicants can also potentially be disproportionately affected, as they were more often from rural high schools than from urban high schools. Future studies need to determine systematic and institutional reasons, if any, for the differential in MMI scoring that can affect admission decisions for some rural applicants. It is also to be noted that the magnitude of difference is small enough that it may ultimately be irrelevant for future physician performance and practitioner outcomes.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Among rural-attribute domains, those with rural community service alone had the highest MMI scores (4.9) while those with rural connections alone had the lowest scores (4.3; p = 0.016)”
From Multiple Mini Interview as an admission tool in higher education: Insights from a systematic review (2019) · cites this paper as Raghavan M. et al., (42) 2013
In the citing paper
“GPA and MCAT scores in a multiple linear regression model, rural-attribute domains were not significant predictors of an applicant's MMI score”
From Multiple Mini Interview as an admission tool in higher education: Insights from a systematic review (2019) · cites this paper as Raghavan M. et al., (42) 2013
In the citing paper
“Rural high school graduates scored significantly lower (mean of 4.4 on scale of 1–7; p,0.05) than urban high school graduates (4.6)”
From Multiple Mini Interview as an admission tool in higher education: Insights from a systematic review (2019) · cites this paper as Raghavan M. et al., (42) 2013
In the citing paper
“GPA (mean of 4.0) of rural high school graduates was similar to that of graduates of urban high schools (4.1)”
From Multiple Mini Interview as an admission tool in higher education: Insights from a systematic review (2019) · cites this paper as Raghavan M. et al., (42) 2013
Citations
Cites
Statistics review 7: Correlation and regression.
Bewick, V., Cheek, L., & Ball, J. (2003) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/cc2401 · Cited by 412
Rabinowitz, H. K. (2001) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.286.9.1041 · Cited by 352
RURAL DOCTORS AND RURAL BACKGROUNDS: HOW STRONG IS THE EVIDENCE? A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Laven, G., & Wilkinson, D. (2003) · Australian Journal of Rural Health · doi:10.1111/j.1440-1584.2003.00534.x · Cited by 280
Predictive validity of the multiple mini-interview for selecting medical trainees
Eva, K. W., Reiter, H. I., Trinh, K., Wasi, P., Rosenfeld, J., & Norman, G. R. (2009) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03407.x · Cited by 267
Characteristics of first-year students in Canadian medical schools.
Dhalla, I. A., Kwong, J., Streiner, D. L., Baddour, R. E., Waddell, A., & Johnson, I. L. (2002) · PubMed Central · Cited by 157
Assessment of non-cognitive traits through the admissions multiple mini-interview
Lemay, J., Lockyer, J. M., Collin, V. T., & Brownell, A. K. W. (2007) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02767.x · Cited by 156
Rabinowitz, H. K., Diamond, J. J., Hojat, M., & Hazelwood, C. E. (1999) · The Journal of Rural Health · doi:10.1111/j.1748-0361.1999.tb00742.x · Cited by 122
Rourke, J. T. B., Incitti, F., Rourke, L. L., & Kennard, M. (2005) · PubMed · Cited by 103
Rourke, J. T. B. (2005) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.1040879 · Cited by 98
Factors associated with rural practice among Australian‐trained general practitioners
Laven, G., Beilby, J., McElroy, H. J., & Wilkinson, D. (2003) · The Medical Journal of Australia · doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.2003.tb05439.x · Cited by 81
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rees, E. L., Hawarden, A. W., Dent, G., Hays, R., Bates, J., & Hassell, A. B. (2016) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.3109/0142159x.2016.1158799 · Cited by 139
Multiple mini-interviews: same concept, different approaches
Knorr, M., & Hissbach, J. (2014) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.12535 · Cited by 110
Shipman, S. A., Wendling, A. L., Jones, K. C., Kovar-Gough, I., Orlowski, J. M., & Phillips, J. P. (2019) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00924 · Cited by 105
Multiple Mini Interview as an admission tool in higher education: Insights from a systematic review
Yusoff, M. S. B. (2019) · Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jtumed.2019.03.006 · Cited by 57
Mian, O., Hogenbirk, J. C., Marsh, D. C., Prowse, O., Cain, M., & Warry, W. (2019) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000002636 · Cited by 42
Henderson, M. C., Kelly, C., Griffin, E., Hall, T. R., Jerant, A. F., Peterson, E. M., Rainwater, J. A., Sousa, F. J., Wofsy, D., & Franks, P. J. (2017) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000002041 · Cited by 36
Impact of sociodemographic characteristics of applicants in multiple mini-interviews
Leduc, J., Rioux, R., Gagnon, R. J., Bourdy, C., & Dennis, A. A. (2016) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2017.1270431 · Cited by 32
Reiter, H., & Eva, K. W. (2017) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000002042 · Cited by 23
Is Canada Ready for Nationwide Collaboration on Medical School Admissions Practices and Policies?
Hanson, M. D., Moineau, G., Kulasegaram, K., & Hammond, R. R. (2016) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000001286 · Cited by 17
Mulder, L., Akwiwu, E. U., Twisk, J. W. R., Koster, A. S., Ravesloot, J. H., Croiset, G., Kusurkar, R. A., & Wouters, A. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0292805 · Cited by 18
Indigenous Student Matriculation into Medical School: Policy and Progress
Sadler, K., Johnson, M., Brunette-Debassige, C., Gula, L. J., Kennard, M. A., Charland, D., Tithecott, G., Cooper, G., Rieder, M. J., Watling, C., et al. (2017) · International Indigenous Policy Journal · doi:10.18584/iipj.2017.8.1.5 · Cited by 14
Insights into student assessment outcomes in rural clinical campuses
Shulruf, B., Velan, G. M., Forster, L., O’Sullivan, A., Harris, P., & Taylor, S. (2019) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-019-1828-z · Cited by 7
Evidence of Differential Attainment in Canadian Medical School Admissions: A Scoping Review
Ngo, T.-A., Choi, J., McIntosh, A., Elma, A., & Grierson, L. (2024) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000005836 · Cited by 4
Parsons, W. L., McHugh, J., & Yi, Y. (2018) · MedEdPublish · doi:10.15694/mep.2018.0000272.1 · Cited by 4
Interviews, Multiple Mini-Interviews, and Selection Centers
Knorr, M., Hissbach, J. C., & Hampe, W. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-94971-0_5 · Cited by 4
Fox, J. L., Beattie, J., McGrail, J., Eley, D. S., Fuller, L., Hu, W. C. Y., Keniry, C., Kondalsamy‐Chennakesavan, S., Parker-Newlyn, L. A., Reid, K., et al. (2025) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-025-07234-3 · Cited by 3
Fox, J. L., Batacan, R. B., Saluja, S., Pullen, C., & McGrail, M. R. (2023) · Education for Health · doi:10.4103/efh.efh_190_23 · Cited by 3
Sabesan, V., Young, L., Carlisle, K., Vangaveti, V., Vu, T., Erp, A. V., & Kapur, N. (2023) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2023.2195969 · Cited by 2
Kliska, E., MacLean, A., & Farrugia, P. (2024) · Canadian Medical Education Journal · doi:10.36834/cmej.75199 · Cited by 2
Stratton, T. D., Elam, C. L., Arnett, P., & Weaver, A. D. (2020) · Journal of Regional Medical Campuses · doi:10.24926/jrmc.v3i1.2240
Attracting Dermatologists to Rural America
Smith, C. F., Amon, G., & Amon, A. (2021) · Sustainable development goals series · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-75984-1_18
Metadata
- Authors
- Raghavan, M., Martin, B., Burnett, M., Aoki, F., Christensen, H., MacKalski, B., Young, D., & Ripstein, I.
- Affiliations
- University of Manitoba (CA)
- Venue
- Rural and Remote Health
- Publisher
- Rural and Remote Health
- Published
- 2013-04-09
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 2362-2362
- ISSN
- 1445-6354 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2147863947
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 1.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Rural and Remote Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Medical Education and Admissions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Global Health Workforce Issues
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
- Keywords
- multiple mini-interviews, medical school admissions, rural-urban divide, rural community services, rural employment, interview scores
- MeSH terms
- College Admission Test, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Job Application, Professional Competence, Rural Health, Schools, Medical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review