Artificial Intelligence in Diabetic Eye Disease Screening
Open accessAbstract
Systematic or national screening programs for diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic macular edema (DME), using digital fundus photography and optical coherence tomography (OCT), are currently implemented at primary care level, aiming to provide timely referral for vision-threatening DR and DME to ophthalmologists for timely treatment and vision loss prevention. However, interpretation of retinal images requires specialized knowledge and expertise in diabetic eye disease. Furthermore, current DR screening programs are capital- and labor-intensive, which makes it difficult to rapidly scale up and expand diabetic eye screening to meet the needs of this growing global epidemic. Deep learning (DL), a new branch of machine learning technology under the broad term of artificial intelligence (AI), has made remarkable breakthrough in medical imaging in particular for pattern recognition and image classification. In ophthalmology, AI and DL technology has been developed from big image datasets in assessment of retinal photographs for detection and screening of DR as well as the segmentation and assessment of OCT images for diagnosis and screening of DME. This review aimed to summarize the current progress and the development of using AI and DL technology for diabetic eye disease screening as well as current challenges in the actual implementation of DL in screening programs, and translating DL research into direct clinical applications of screening in a community setting.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A deep generative AI model analyzing retinal images and patient records can identify subtle retinal changes that precede clinically observable damage.
“A notable example comes from research on diabetic retinopathy, in this study, a deep generative AI model was used to analyze retinal images and patient records, identifying subtle retinal changes that precede clinically observable damage (77).”
From Generative artificial intelligence in predictive analysis of diabetes and its complications: a narrative review (2025) · cites this paper as [77]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 44 · Cited by 82
- Authors
- Cheung, C. Y.-L., Tang, F., Ting, D. S. W., Tan, G. S. W., & Wong, T. Y.
- Affiliations
- Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Singapore National Eye Center (SG)
- Corresponding author
- Carol Yim-Lui Cheung
- Fangyao Tang
- Venue
- Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology
- Published
- 2019
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 158-164
- ISSN
- 2162-0989 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2981937790
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 6.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research
- Keywords
- diabetic retinopathy, diabetic macular edema, diabetic retinopathy screening, artificial intelligence, deep learning, digital fundus photography, optical coherence tomography, retinal image classification, primary care screening, clinical implementation of AI, blindness prevention
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review