Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 12

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Biplot analysis of trait relations of spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) landraces

Sabaghnia, Naser, Mohebodini, Mehdi, Janmohammadi, Mohsen·2016·Genetika

Abstract

Interest in growing winter spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) in Iran is increasing due to its good nutritional potential returns relative to other vegetable crops. The objectives of this research were to investigate the interrelationships among different traits of spinach and to evaluate different Iranian spinach landraces with application of the genotype ? trait (GT) biplot methodology in visualizing research data. 81 spinach landraces were grown during 2-years according to randomized complete block design with four replications. Ranking of the genotypes based on the ideal entry revealed that genotypes G1, G20, G7, G8, G9, G27, G49 G70 and G79 were higher in the measured traits and could be good candidates for improving most of the measured traits. Ranking of traits for the leaf yield showed that petiole diameter, petiole length, leaf numbers at flowering, 1000-seed weight and root dry weight were the most discriminating traits which influence spinach leaf yield at both years. There were 9 winning genotypes and 4 which-won-where patterns at the first year while there were 8 winning genotypes and 4 which-won-where patterns at the second year. As a result, the findings from our study are as follows: (i) traits leaf numbers at flowering, leaf length, leaf width, leaf area, petiole diameter and petiole length could be as selection indices for spinach leaf yield improvement, (ii) genotypes G1, G20, G7, G8, G9, G27, G49 G70, and G79 were the most favorable and is thus recommended for commercial release or incorporating in breeding programs; (iii) the GT biplot method can be used to identify superior genotypes in other crops and in other parts of the world.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2298/gensr1602675s

Cites

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Polygon view of genotype × traits biplot of measured traits of 81 spinach landraces for (up) the first year and (down) the second year, showing which landrace(s) had the highest values for which traits. See Table 1 for codes of the traits.
Figure 1 Polygon view of genotype × traits biplot of measured traits of 81 spinach landraces for (up) the first year and (down) the second year, showing which landrace(s) had the highest values for which traits. See Table 1 for codes of the traits.CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Figure 2 Vector view of genotype × traits biplot of measured traits of 81 spinach landraces for (up) the first year and (down) the second year, showing interrelationships among traits. See Table 1 for codes of the traits.
Figure 2 Vector view of genotype × traits biplot of measured traits of 81 spinach landraces for (up) the first year and (down) the second year, showing interrelationships among traits. See Table 1 for codes of the traits.CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 3
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Figure 3 Ideal-entry view of genotype × traits biplot of measured traits of 81 spinach landraces for (up) the first year and (down) the second year, showing ranking of landraces according to the best supposed genotypes. See Table 1 for codes of the traits.
Figure 3 Ideal-entry view of genotype × traits biplot of measured traits of 81 spinach landraces for (up) the first year and (down) the second year, showing ranking of landraces according to the best supposed genotypes. See Table 1 for codes of the traits.CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF
Image 5
CC-BY-NC-ND · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. AVSAR B. (2011): Genetic diversity of Turkish spinach cultivars (Spinacia oleracea L.). A Master dissertation, Graduate School of Engineering and Sciences, Izmir Institute of Technology, Turkey.
  2. MORELOCK T.E., J.C. CORRELL (2008): Spinach In: Handbook of Plant Breeding. Vegetables I, Asteraceae, Brassicaceae, Chenopodicaceae, and Cucurbitaceae Edited by Prohens J, Nuez F, Springer, New York. pp. 189-218.
  3. MURPHY J.B. (2001): Lutein content of spinach cultivars and breeding lines. National Spinach Conference. 14- 15. November 2001, Fayetteville, AR USA.
  4. PEARSON O.H. (1983): Heterosis in vegetable crops. In: Frankel R (ed) Heterosis: reappraisal of theory and practice. Monographs Theoretical Applied enetics vol.6 Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg New York, pp. 171-175.
  5. PROHENS-TOMAS J., F. NUEZ (2008): Vegetables I: Asteraceae, Brassicaceae, Chenopodicaceae, and Cucurbitaceae: 1 (Handbook of Plant Breeding). Springer, 428 pages.
  6. YAN W., M.S. KANG (2003): GGE Biplot Analysis: A Graphical Tool for Breeders, Geneticists, and Agronomists. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
  7. YAN W. (2014): Crop Variety Trials: Data Management and Analysis. Wiley-Blackwell, 360 pp. UK.

Cited by

See all 12

Metadata

Authors
Sabaghnia, N., Mohebodini, M., & Janmohammadi, M.
Affiliations
University of Maragheh, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Maragheh, Iran
Venue
Genetika
Published
2016
Volume
48
Issue
2
Pages
675-690
ISSN
  • 0534-0012
  • 1820-6069
Cited by
12
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biplot analysis of trait relations of spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) landraces. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2298/gensr1602675s
The paper
Sabaghnia, N., Mohebodini, M., & Janmohammadi, M. (2016). Biplot analysis of trait relations of spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) landraces. Genetika. https://doi.org/10.2298/gensr1602675s