Cited by 5Fluid Dynamics and MixingAdvanced Scientific Research MethodsMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction

High cell density cultivation of Bacillus subtilis NCIM 2063: Modeling, optimization and a scale-up procedure

Open access
Stamenkovic-Stojanovic, Sandra, Karabegovic, Ivana, Danilovic, Bojana, Mancic, Stojan, Lazic, Miodrag·2023·Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society

Abstract

Bacillus subtilis is a non-pathogenic, sporulating, Gram-positive bacteria with pronounced antimicrobial and metabolic activity and great potential for wide application in various fields. The aim of this paper was to determine the optimum B. subtilis NCIM 2063 growth conditions and to scale up biomass production from shake flasks to a bioreactor level. The critical growth parameters and their interaction effects were studied using Box?Behnken experimental design and response surface methodology. Developed model equations were statistically significant with good prediction capability. It was found that during shake flask cultivation glucose should be added in concentration up to 5 g L-1 in DSM medium, OTR at 10 mol m-3 h-1 and temperature of 33?C, to achieve the maximum number of viable cells and spores. To scale up the process from shake flasks to the bioreactor level kLa was used as a main criterion. Scale up effect was evaluated by comparing the growth kinetics in the shake flasks and in a laboratory bioreactor. The total number of cells obtained in the bioreactor was 4.57x109 CFU mL-1 which is 1.41 times higher than the number of cells in the shake flasks (3.24x109 CFU mL-1), proving that the scale-up procedure was conducted successfully.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2298/jsc230407036s

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stamenkovic-Stojanovic, S., Karabegovic, I., Danilovic, B., Mancic, S., & Lazic, M.
Affiliations
Faculty of Technology, University of Niš, Leskovac, Serbia
Venue
Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society
Published
2023
Volume
88
Issue
11
Pages
1103-1117
ISSN
  • 0352-5139 (ISSN-L)
  • 1820-7421
OpenAlex
W4384135155
Cited by
5
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 5
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia (451-03-47/2023-01/200133)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Advanced Scientific Research Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
Keywords
Bacillus subtilis, high cell density culture, biomass production, scale-up, bioreactors, shake flask, glucose concentration, oxygen transfer rate, temperature, growth kinetics, viable cell count, sporulation, oxygen transfer coefficient

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review