Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 74Economic and Social IssuesPolitical theory and GramsciPolitical Economy and Marxism

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Neoliberalisation of Sustainability

Open access
Tulloch, Lynley, Neilson, David·2014·Citizenship, Social and Economics Education

Abstract

Sustainability – embedded in intergovernmental global agreements and filtering, reassuringly, into ‘common sense’ – is now the globally dominant environmental discourse. However, this dominance does not equate with the mainstreaming of its original meaning that is tied up with a radical critique of capitalism that crystallised in movements of both the South and the North in the 1970s. Rather, radical sustainability discourse has been effectively neutralised by its ‘articulation’ with the neoliberal capitalist project. This article examines this articulatory shift, focusing particularly on a post-Marxist neo-Gramscian inspired discourse analysis of the key documents of intergovernmental global agreement. The article argues for the rearticulation of sustainability to a new counter-hegemonic ‘reimagining’ of nature.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2304/csee.2014.13.1.26

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Aglietta M., 1999, New Left Review, 232, 41
  2. Bookchin M., 1968, Antipode, 10, 89
  3. Bookchin M., 1988, Socialist Review, 18, 9
  4. Carson R., 2002, Silent Spring
  5. Hardin G., 1974, Psychology Today, 8, 38
  6. Hardin G., 2005, Debating the Earth: The environmental politics reader
  7. Lipietz A., 1987, Mirages and Miracles: The transformation of global Fordism
  8. McCord P.A., 2008, Left History, 13, 14
  9. Mayo P., 2005, Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 3, 65
  10. Neilson D., 2013, Knowledge Cultures, 1, 73
  11. Robottom I., 1993, Research in Environmental Education: Engaging the debate
  12. United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), 1992, Environmental Education for Sustainable Societies and Global Responsibility: A citizen's treaty from the NGO forum of the UNCED (Agenda 21)
  13. United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), 2012, The Future We Want

Cited by

See all 74

Metadata

Authors
Tulloch, L., & Neilson, D.
Affiliations
University of Waikato (NZ)
Venue
Citizenship, Social and Economics Education
Published
2014-01-01
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
26-38
ISSN
  • 1478-8047 (ISSN-L)
  • 2047-1734
OpenAlex
W2088239457
Cited by
74
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
3.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Citizenship Social and Economics Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Economic and Social Issues
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political theory and Gramsci
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Economy and Marxism
Keywords
neoliberalism, sustainability, environmental discourse, critique of capitalism, counter-hegemony, post-Marxism, global environmental governance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.