Neo-Liberalism and Marketisation: The Implications for Higher Education
Open accessAbstract
This article is based on a keynote paper presented to the European Conference on Educational Research (ECER), University College Dublin, 5–9 September 2005. The massification of education in European countries over the last 100 years has produced cultures and societies that have benefited greatly from state investment in education. To maintain this level of social and economic development that derives from high quality education requires continual state investment. With the rise of the New Right, neo-liberal agenda, there is an attempt to offload the cost of education, and indeed other public services such as housing, transport, care services etc., on to the individual. There is an increasing attempt to privatise public services, including education, so that citizens will have to buy them at market value rather than have them provided by the state. Europe is no exception to this trend of neo-liberalisation. Recent Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) reports, including one on higher education in Ireland, (2004), concentrate strongly on the role of education in servicing the economy to the neglect of its social and developmental responsibilities. The view that education is simply another market commodity has become normalised in policy and public discourses. Schools run purely as businesses are a growing phenomenon within and without Europe, and there is an increasing expectation in several countries that schools will supplement their income from privat…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 87 · Cited by 599
- Authors
- Lynch, K.
- Affiliations
- University College Dublin (IE)
- Corresponding author
- Lynch, Kathleen
- ORCID
- Lynch, Kathleen
- Venue
- European Educational Research Journal
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-17
- ISSN
- 1474-9041 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2119147842
- Cited by
- 599
- References
- 87
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 31
- FWCI
- 61.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- European Educational Research Journal (publishedVersion)
- Research Repository UCD (University College Dublin) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Higher Education Governance and Development
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Educational Policies and Reforms
- Social Sciences › Education › University Challenges and Reforms
- Keywords
- neoliberalism, marketization of education, higher education, New Right, privatization of education, state investment in education, massification of education, public intellectuals, counter-hegemonic discourse, civil society organizations, education policy, Ireland
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review