The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Posthuman Humanities
Open accessAbstract
This article compares notes on different and new concepts of ‘the Human’, developed both within disciplinary and interdisciplinary academic scientific research and in broader social practices. The main focus is on the shifting relationship between the ‘two cultures' of the humanities and science in the light of contemporary developments, such as the sophisticated forms of interdisciplinary research that have emerged in the fields of biotechnologies, neural sciences, environmental and climate change research and Information and Communication technologies. These rapid changes affect the very definitions of the human and of human evolution. The question is how and to what extent they have an impact on both the practice of the humanities and on their self-representation. Is humanism challenged or strengthened by these developments? To what extent is anthropocentrism called to task by what is becoming known as posthuman theory?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia
Gilman, S. L., Deleuze, G., Guattari, F., & Massumi, B. (1989) · Journal of Interdisciplinary History · doi:10.2307/203963 · Cited by 22,692
Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment.
Brewer, R. M., & Collins, P. H. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074808 · Cited by 19,445
The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences.
Moore, F. C. T., & Foucault, M. (1971) · Man · doi:10.2307/2799252 · Cited by 8,100
Derrida, J. (2001) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203991787 · Cited by 7,492
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-1461 · Cited by 6,721
The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice
Mol, A. (2002) · doi:10.1215/9780822384151 · Cited by 4,381
Irigaray, L. (1977) · Feminisms · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-14428-0_22 · Cited by 4,193
A Critique of Postcolonial Reason: Toward a History of the Vanishing Present
Spivak, G. C. (1999) · doi:10.2307/j.ctvjsf541 · Cited by 4,152
The science question in feminism
Waters, K. (1987) · Women's Studies International Forum · doi:10.1016/0277-5395(87)90077-x · Cited by 3,804
The Climate of History: Four Theses
Chakrabarty, D. (2009) · Critical Inquiry · doi:10.1086/596640 · Cited by 3,770
Cited by
Omodan, B. I. (2025) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2025.2536534 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Braidotti, R.
- Venue
- European Educational Research Journal
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-01-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-19
- ISSN
- 1474-9041 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4251748782
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 50
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Posthuman Humanities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2304/eerj.2013.12.1.1
- The paper
- Braidotti, R. (2013). Posthuman Humanities. European Educational Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2013.12.1.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
