Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 180

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Best practice guidelines for surveys and monitoring of great ape populations

Open access
Kühl, H., Maisels, F., Ancrenaz, M., Williamson, E.A.·2008·IUCN eBooks

Abstract

The combination of threats currently facing the remaining great apes requires immediate conservation action at all scales – from site-level initiatives, through national and regional strategies, to international conventions and action plans. This document outlines current approaches to great ape surveys and monitoring for field biologists, protected area managers, government wildlife departments and the conservation community at large. It contains detailed, additional information on survey design, field methods, analytical approaches, and practical considerations such as logistics, finance, and standardized reporting.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2305/iucn.ch.2008.ssc-op.36.en

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 180

Metadata

Authors
Kühl, H., Maisels, F., Ancrenaz, M., & Williamson, E. A.
Venue
IUCN eBooks
Publisher
IUCN
Published
2008
OpenAlex
W148482741
Cited by
180
References
3
FWCI
11.16
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Best practice guidelines for surveys and monitoring of great ape populations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2305/iucn.ch.2008.ssc-op.36.en
The paper
Kühl, H., Maisels, F., Ancrenaz, M., & Williamson, E. A. (2008). Best practice guidelines for surveys and monitoring of great ape populations. IUCN eBooks. https://doi.org/10.2305/iucn.ch.2008.ssc-op.36.en

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.