The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Equity: In Theory and Practice
Abstract
Governments and institutions, perhaps even more than markets, determine who gets what in our society. They make the crucial choices about who pays the taxes, who gets into college, who gets medical care, who gets drafted, where the hazardous waste dump is sited, and how much we pay for public services. Debate about these issues inevitably centres on the question of whether the solution is fair. In Equity: In Theory and Practice, H. Peyton Young offers a systematic explanation of what we mean by fairness in distributing public resources and burdens, and applies the theory to actual cases. Young begins by reviewing some of the major theories of social justice, showing that none of them explains how societies resolve distributive problems in practice. He then suggests an alternative approach to analyzing fairness in concrete situations: equity, he argues, does not boil down to a single formula, but represents a balance between competing principles of need, desert, and social utility. The studies Young uses to illustrate his approach include the design of income tax schedules, priority schemes for allocating scarce medical resources, formulas for distributing political representation, and criteria for setting fees for public services. Each represents a unique blend of historical perspective, rigorous analysis, and an emphasis on practical solutions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dominant resource fairness: fair allocation of multiple resource types
Ghodsi, A., Zaharia, M., Hindman, B., Konwinski, A., Shenker, S. J., & Stoica, I. G. (2011) · doi:10.5555/1972457.1972490 · Cited by 1,049
Are women less selfish than men?: Evidence from dictator experiments.
Eckel, C. C., & Grossman, P. J. (1998) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/1468-0297.00311 · Cited by 1,000
Which Is the Fairest One of All? A Positive Analysis of Justice Theories
Konow, J. (2003) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/002205103771800013 · Cited by 852
Guilt by Association: Strategic Failure Prevention and Recovery Capacity Investments
Kim, S.-H., & Tomlin, B. (2013) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1120.1658 · Cited by 71
Assessing Algorithmic Fairness with Unobserved Protected Class Using Data Combination
Kallus, N., Mao, X., & Zhou, A. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.00285 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuenne, R. E., & Young, H. P.
- Venue
- Southern Economic Journal
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1995-01
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 885
- ISSN
- 0038-4038 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2029467699
- Cited by
- 658
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 104.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Equity: In Theory and Practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1061013
- The paper
- Kuenne, R. E., & Young, H. P. (1995). Equity: In Theory and Practice. Southern Economic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2307/1061013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.