The DOI matches its Crossref record.
External Freedom according to Kant
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“But Wille and Willkür are two aspects of human freedom as such, 78 and it would make no sense to say that a person may exhibit Willkür without being also possessed of Wille.”
From Kant on Capital Punishment and Suicide (2006) · cites this paper as Benson (1987), 571
In the citing paper
“Now, we have seen that Kant's view of freedom involves the distinction between Wille and Willkür -and that it is the latter that accounts for a free, imputable act, which is freely made even where it is made irrationally, i.e., against the dictates of Wille as practical reason.”
From Kant on Capital Punishment and Suicide (2006) · cites this paper as Benson (1987), 571
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kant on Capital Punishment and Suicide
Ataner, A. (2006) · Kant Studien · doi:10.1515/kant.2006.028 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Benson, P.
- Corresponding author
- Benson, Peter
- Venue
- Columbia Law Review
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1987-04
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 559
- ISSN
- 0010-1958 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2797427764
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2020: 13 · 2017: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Columbia Law Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal Rights and Human Rights
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- Immanuel Kant, external freedom, freedom, autonomy, ethics, political philosophy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: External Freedom according to Kant. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1122671
- The paper
- Benson, P. (1987). External Freedom according to Kant. Columbia Law Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/1122671
