Cited by 321Social Representations and IdentityChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentPsychology of Development and Education

Private speech: Four studies and a review of theories

Kohlberg, Lawrence, Yaeger, Judy, Hjertholm, Else·1968·Child Development

Abstract

Similarities and differences in the views of private or egocentric speech held by Piaget, Vygotsky, G. H. Mead, and Flavell are examined. These views are related to previous findings and to four new studies of the effects of age, IQ, and task difficulty upon private speech in various natural and experimental settings. These studies support the interpretation common to all the theorists in that mental age and task difficulty were found to be primary and regular determinants of private speech in contrast to such factors as sex, nationality, or chronological as opposed to mental age. The findings also support Vygotsky's belief that private speech has a curvilinear course of development (due to its functioning as a transition from outer speech to thought) as opposed to Piaget's view that it declines monotonically with cognitive and social maturity. 7 types of private speech are defined and evidence is presented suggesting that they form a developmental hierarchy consistent with Mead's view of the transformations of external communication to inner thought.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1126979

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is evidence to support Vygotsky's claim that self-regulatory speech "goes underground" in middle childhood to form inner speech, with private speech peaking in incidence around age 5 and then declining in parallel with a growth in inner speech use.

    “There is evidence to support Vygotsky’s claim that self-regulatory speech “goes underground” in middle childhood to form inner speech, with private speech peaking in incidence around age 5 (Kohlberg, Yaeger, & Hjertholm, 1968) and then declining in parallel with a growth in inner speech use (Damianova, Lucas, & Sullivan, 2012) as defined by Fernyhough and Fradley’s (2005) criteria.”

    From Inner Speech: Development, Cognitive Functions, Phenomenology, and Neurobiology (2015) · cites this paper as Kohlberg, Yaeger, & Hjertholm, 1968

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kohlberg, L., Yaeger, J., & Hjertholm, E.
Venue
Child Development
Published
1968-09
Volume
39
Issue
3
Pages
691
ISSN
0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2153153620
Cited by
321
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
17.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Representations and Identity
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Psychology of Development and Education
Keywords
private speech, egocentric speech, Piaget, Vygotsky, Mead, Flavell, mental age, task difficulty, IQ, age differences, cognitive development, social development (developmental psychology)
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Child, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Echolalia, Ego, Female, Humans, Intelligence, Interpersonal Relations, Language Development, Male, Peer Group, Psychological Theory, Social Behavior, Speech, Verbal Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review