Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 82Developmental and Educational NeuropsychologyPsychological Testing and AssessmentCognitive Abilities and Testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Visual Scanning Strategies of Reflective, Impulsive, Fast-Accurate, and Slow-Inaccurate Children on the Matching Familiar Figures Test

Ault, Ruth L., Crawford, David E., Jeffrey, W. E.·1972·Child Development

Abstract

Ruth L. Ault, David E. Crawford, W. E. Jeffrey, Visual Scanning Strategies of Reflective, Impulsive, Fast-Accurate, and Slow-Inaccurate Children on the Matching Familiar Figures Test, Child Development, Vol. 43, No. 4 (Dec., 1972), pp. 1412-1417

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1127527

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Ault, R. L., Crawford, D. E., & Jeffrey, W. E.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Child Development
Published
1972-12
Volume
43
Issue
4
Pages
1412
ISSN
0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1965762394
Cited by
82
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
13.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
Matching Familiar Figures Test, recognition memory
MeSH terms
Attention, Child, Child Development, Eye Movements, Female, Fixation, Ocular, Form Perception, Humans, Hyperkinesis, Impulsive Behavior, Male, Motivation, Psychological Tests, Reaction Time, Sex Factors, Teaching, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.