The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
Perception of Numerical Invariance in Neonates
Abstract
40 healthy, normal newborn infants were evaluated with reference to their ability to discriminate among visual stimulus arrays consisting of 2 versus 3 or 4 versus 6 black dots. Infants made this discrimination within a habituation/dishabituation paradigm for the small number sets (2 to 3 and 3 to 2) but not for the larger sets (4 to 6 and 6 to 4). We argue that this suggests the ability to abstract numerical invariance from small-set visual arrays and may be evidence for complex information processing during the first week of life.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Children's mathematical development: Research and practical applications.
Geary, D. C. (1994) · doi:10.1037/10163-000 · Cited by 565
Numerical competence in animals: Definitional issues, current evidence, and a new research agenda
Davis, H., & Pérusse, R. (1988) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00053437 · Cited by 508
Krajewski, K., & Schneider, W. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2009.03.009 · Cited by 493
A dynamic systems model of cognitive and language growth.
van Geert, P. (1991) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.98.1.3 · Cited by 464
Passolunghi, M. C., Mammarella, I. C., & Altoè, G. (2008) · Developmental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/87565640801982320 · Cited by 179
Metadata
- Authors
- Antell, S. E., & Keating, D. P.
- Venue
- Child Development
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1983-06-01
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 695-695
- ISSN
- 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4242437711
- Cited by
- 651
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Perception of Numerical Invariance in Neonates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1983.tb00495.x
- The paper
- Antell, S. E., & Keating, D. P. (1983). Perception of Numerical Invariance in Neonates. Child Development. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1983.tb00495.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
