Age differences in the reliability of the psychiatric interview of the child
Abstract
Craig Edelbrock, Anthony J. Costello, Mina K. Dulcan, Robert Kalas, Noelle Calabro Conover, Age Differences in the Reliability of the Psychiatric Interview of the Child, Child Development, Vol. 56, No. 1 (Feb., 1985), pp. 265-275
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Age 9 years is the earliest age for which reliability of assessment of DSM symptoms is available.
“Age of 9 years is the earliest age for which reliability of the assessment of DSM symptoms is available.13”
From Subthreshold Symptoms of Depression in Preadolescent Girls Are Stable and Predictive of Depressive Disorders (2008) · cites this paper as [13]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 474
- Authors
- Edelbrock, C., Costello, A. J., Dulcan, M. K., Kalas, R., & Conover, N. C.
- ORCID
- Costello, Anthony J.
- Venue
- Child Development
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1985-02
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 265
- ISSN
- 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4231930614
- Cited by
- 474
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 26.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Child Development (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- age differences, reliability statistics, psychiatric interview, child assessment, child psychiatry, inter-rater reliability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
