Cited by 271Early Childhood Education and DevelopmentPsychosocial Factors Impacting YouthYouth Development and Social Support

The Impact of School Transitions in Early Adolescence on the Self-System and Perceived Social Context of Poor Urban Youth

Seidman, Edward, Allen, LaRue, Aber, J. Lawrence, Mitchell, Christina, Feinman, Joanna·1994·Child Development

Abstract

This study examined the effects of the normative school transition (n = 580) during early adolescence on the self-system and perceived school and peer social contexts of poor, black (n = 161), white (n = 146), and Latino (n = 273) youth in the public school systems of 3 eastern urban cities. The results revealed negative effects of the school transition on the affective and behavioral domains of the self-system. These declines in self-esteem, class preparation, and grade-point average (GPA) were common across race/ethnicity and gender. Concurrently, the school transition was perceived to be associated with changes in the school and peer contexts. Daily hassles with the school increased, while social support and extracurricular involvement decreased over the transition. Daily hassles with peers decreased, and peer values were perceived as more antisocial. These changes in the school and peer microsystems were also common across race/ethnicity and gender. In addition, transition-associated school and peer changes and, in particular, changes in daily hassles with the school were associated with changes in the academic dimensions of the self-system, that is, academic efficacy expectations, class preparation, and GPA. The results are discussed within a developmental mismatch framework.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1131399

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most studies found self-esteem levels were high during elementary school and decreased during the middle school transition in the US, Portugal, and Germany.

    “Most studies have found that self-esteem levels were high during elementary school and decreased during the middle school transition in the US (Cantin & Boivin, 2004;Seidman et al., 1994;Wigfield et al., 1991), Portugal (Coelho et al., 2020), and Germany (Arens et al., 2013).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Cited by 271

Authors
Seidman, E., Allen, L., Aber, J. L., Mitchell, C., & Feinman, J.
Venue
Child Development
Published
1994-04
Volume
65
Issue
2
Pages
507
ISSN
0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4243344777
Cited by
271
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 14
FWCI
13.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Child Development (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH43084)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychosocial Factors Impacting Youth
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
Keywords
transition to school, early adolescence, self-system, child poverty, urban schools, self-concept, peer relationships

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review