Cited by 57Family Dynamics and RelationshipsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPersonality Traits and Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Genetic influences on perceptions of childhood family environment: a reared-apart twin study

Hur, Yoon-Mi, Bouchard, Thomas J.·1995·Child Development

Abstract

This study estimates the extent to which heredity influences perceptions of childhood family environment in a sample of 58 monozygotic and 46 dizygotic pairs of adult twins who were reared apart. The measures used to assess family environments were the Family Environment Scale (FES) and Block Environmental Questionnaire (BEQ). A principal component factor analysis with a VARIMAX rotation of the FES and BEQ yielded 2 major factors--Support, and Organization and Cultural Orientation. Single and multiple indicator model-fitting techniques were applied to the reared apart twin data on the 2 factors. Perceived support in childhood family environments was fitted best by a model incorporating additive genetic and unshared environmental factors. Perceived organization was fitted most adequately by a model which includes only unshared environmental factors. Maximum-likelihood estimates of heritability from model-fitting analyses suggest that genetic factors explain 44% of the variance of perceptions of support dimension in childhood family environments.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1131581

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Genetic effects contribute to relative sensitivity of response to specific environments and shape the propensity to seek out certain environments over others.

    “Genetic effects also play a role in determining the potency of these relationships; they contribute both to relative sensitivity of response to specific environments (Trucco et al., 2016) as well as by shaping the propensity to seek out certain environments over others (cf. Hur and Bouchard, 1995; Reiss et al., 2000).”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hur, Y.-M., & Bouchard, T. J.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
Child Development
Published
1995-04
Volume
66
Issue
2
Pages
330
ISSN
0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1965161558
Cited by
57
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
13.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
heritability, twins reared apart, childhood family environment, perceived family support, family organization, cultural orientation, monozygotic twins, dizygotic twins, additive genetic effects, nonshared environment, Family Environment Scale
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Attitude, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Genetic, Personality Assessment, Personality Development, Social Environment, Social Support, Twins, Twins, Dizygotic, Twins, Monozygotic, Parenting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review