Cited by 550Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyCognitive Functions and Memory

Intact and Impaired Memory Functions in Autism

Bennetto, Loisa, Pennington, Bruce F., Rogers, Sally J.·1996·Child Development

Abstract

This study examined memory functions in individuals with autism. Based on previous evidence of executive function (EF) deficits, we hypothesized that subjects with autism would demonstrate a pattern of intact and impaired memory functions similar to that found in other groups with EF deficits, such as patients with frontal lobe pathology. We compared the performance of high-functioning children and adolescents with autism (n = 19) and clinical comparison subjects (n = 19) matched on sex, CA, and VIQ on measures of memory and EF. The group with autism performed significantly worse than comparison subjects on measures of temporal order memory, source memory, supraspan free recall, working memory, and EF, but not on short- and long-term recognition, cued recall, or new learning ability, consistent with the predictions of the EF theory. The cognitive measures were significantly more intercorrelated in the autism group than the comparison group, consistent with a limit in central cognition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1131734

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Performance on simple verbal working memory tasks, such as word recall and digit recall, has been shown to be unimpaired in individuals with ASD.

    “In contrast, performance on simple verbal working memory tasks, such as word recall (e.g., Russell, Jarrold, & Henry, 1996) and digit recall (Bennetto, Pennington, & Rogers, 1996;Faja & Dawson, 2014;Williams et al., 2005;Williams et al., 2006), has been shown to be unimpaired.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 95 · Cited by 550

Authors
Bennetto, L., Pennington, B. F., & Rogers, S. J.
Affiliations
University of Denver (US)
Venue
Child Development
Published
1996-08
Volume
67
Issue
4
Pages
1816
ISSN
0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2041309295
Cited by
550
References
95
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 44
FWCI
5.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1f31mh010470-01)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH10470, MH 38820, MH 00419)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, memory function, executive dysfunction, temporal order memory, source memory, working memory, frontal lobe pathology, recognition memory
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Autistic Disorder, Child, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Memory, Memory Disorders, Verbal Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review