Vagal Regulation of Heart Rate in the Prediction of Developmental Outcome for Very Low Birth Weight Preterm Infants
Abstract
Jane A. Doussard-Roosevelt, Stephen W. Porges, John W. Scanlon, Behjat Alemi, Kathleen B. Scanlon, Vagal Regulation of Heart Rate in the Prediction of Developmental Outcome for Very Low Birth Weight Preterm Infants, Child Development, Vol. 68, No. 2 (Apr., 1997), pp. 173-186
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
High-risk preterm newborns show maturational RSA trajectories.
“In addition, maturational RSA trajectories in high-risk preterm newborns were observed [55]”
From The vagal paradox: A polyvagal solution (2023) · cites this paper as [55]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 100
- Authors
- Doussard-Roosevelt, J. A., Porges, S. W., Scanlon, J. W., Alemi, B., & Scanlon, K. B.
- ORCID
- Porges, Stephen W.
- Venue
- Child Development
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-04
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 173
- ISSN
- 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4229927432
- Cited by
- 100
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Child Development (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
- Keywords
- vagal regulation, heart rate variability, very low birth weight infants, preterm infants, developmental outcome prediction, autonomic nervous system, neurobehavioral outcomes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
