A Police Service Rating Scale
Abstract
Criticism of his government, of governmental bodies, and of public officials has long been a cherished, free-for-all prerogative of every American citizen. Of such criticism the police bodies of the United States have had their full share, and by far the greater part of it has come, and still comes, from the general public.1 Further-more, this criticism is widely scattered in the public prints. The question might well be asked, "What knowledge of police work is possessed by the critics? " The answer is, of course, that they have little or none, especially of police work in its entirety. Yet they never hesitate to pass judgment, no matter how ill informed they may be of police work in general and of the particular occurrence that they are presuming to judge. Such criticism is obviously unfair; it is, indeed; often entirely unwarranted by the actual facts.. In the fall of 1926, for example, it was charged that vice was rampant in Detroit, and the responsibility for this state of affairs
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Citizens are more likely to cooperate with legal authorities and obey the law when they view those legal authorities as legitimate.
“people obey the law and cooperate with legal authorities primarily if and when they view those legal authorities as legitimate (Bayley & Mendelsohn, 1968;Bellman, 1935;Decker, 1981;Parratt, 1938;Reiss, 1971;Walker, Richardson, Williams, Denyer, & McGaughey, 1972;Winfree & Griffiths, 1971; see also Tyler, 2006).”
From Legitimacy in Policing: A Systematic Review (2013) · cites this paper as Bellman, 1935
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 21
- Authors
- Bellman, A.
- Corresponding author
- Bellman, Arthur
- Venue
- Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1931-1951)
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1935-05
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 74
- ISSN
- 0885-2731 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W52281651
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 5
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1931-1951) (publishedVersion)
- bepress Legal Repository (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Keywords
- police performance evaluation, police accountability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review