The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Observations on the Shilluk of the Upper Nile. Customary Law: Marriage and the Violation of Rights in Women
Abstract
Opening Paragraph: In a previous article on the Shilluk I discussed the laws of homicide and the legal and ritual functions of the reth or King. An interpretation of Shilluk law and authority is not easy because, apart from early contacts with the peoples of the northern Sudan, they have been subjected to external influences and some kind of Government since the early years of the last century. These contacts began with cursory and not altogether happy encounters with the Turco-Egyptian Government which were followed by the establishment of a provincial headquarters at Kodok in 1867 under the authority of a mudir; later came the turbulent and dismal years of the Mahdia and finally the occupation by the present Government in 1898. It would be idle to suppose that the political system of the Shilluk has remained unaffected by these influences. The Shilluk are by reputation an exceptionally conservative people and certainly the effects of their relations with outsiders are, to the casual observer, hard to detect. Profound changes have taken place none the less, especially in the sphere of customary law, and these changes are undoubtedly gathering momentum.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“One reth (Fadiet) is remembered to have failed in an attempt to reduce the descendants of Nyadwai to Ororo status but it is not clear if any other king has ever been successful (Pumphreys 1941: 12-13, Hofmayr 1925: 66;Howell 1953: 202).Most sources suggested none have”
From The divine kingship of the Shilluk (2011) · cites this paper as Howell 1953: 202
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Pumphrey, 1941, The Shilluk Tribe, S.N.R., xxiv
- 1952, Observations on the Shilluk of the Upper Nile: The laws of homicide and the legal functions of the reth, Africa, xxii
- 1941, Sudan Notes and Records, xxiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The divine kingship of the Shilluk
Graeber, D. (2011) · HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory · doi:10.14318/2fhau.v1i1.7 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Howell, P. P.
- Corresponding author
- Howell, P. P.
- Venue
- Africa
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1953-04
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 94-109
- ISSN
- 0001-9720 (ISSN-L)
- 1750-0184
- OpenAlex
- W2062915554
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Africa (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › African history and culture studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › African Studies and Ethnography
- Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
- Keywords
- Shilluk, customary law, marriage, women's rights, violation of rights, Upper Nile, legal authority, kingship, colonial impact, Mahdia, Sudan
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review