Cited by 232

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Manufacturing dissent: work, gender and the politics of meaning in a peasant society

Carney, Judith, Watts, Michael·1990·Africa

Abstract

Introduction: The Manufacturing of Dissent: This article addresses the changing nature of farm work in a peasant society in The Gambia, West Africa. The practice of farm labour has been transformed in the most palpable way by the advent of radically new technical and social relations of production associated with mechanised double-cropping of irrigated rice. Technical change, agricultural intensification and a new labour process are, however, all built upon the bedrock of household production, since peasant growers are socially integrated into the new scheme as contract farmers, specifically as contracted sharecroppers. Family labour continues to be the dominant social form in which labour power is mobilised, but under conditions directly determined and shaped by the contractors, namely project management. Irrigated double-cropping of rice production is particularly labour-demanding and makes expanded claims on customary structures of domestic labour recruitment. These new economic practices subject the culturally dominant representations of work, labour obligations and property rights—the constituents of custom and tradition— to the test of social practice. In our examination of Mandinka rice growers we suggest, following T. J. Clark, that ‘society is a battlefield of representations on which the limits and coherence of any given set are being fought for and regularly spoilt’ (Clark, 1984: 6). The introduction of a new production regime has converted rural Mandinka society into a contested social terrain; the primary struggle is a contest over gender and the conjugal contract in which property, or more accurately constellations of property rights, is at stake. By seeing economic life as, among other things, a realm of representations, we argue that the struggles over meaning and the manufacture of symbolic and material dissent in central Gambia—a proliferation of intrahousehold conflicts, juridical battles over divorce in the local courts, renegotiations of the conjugal contract—are the idioms of what Burawoy (1985) calls production politics.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1160333

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 71

  1. Whitehead, 1981, Of Marriage and the Market, 88
  2. Weil P. 1968. ‘Mandinka Mansaya: the Role of the Mandinka in the Political System of The Gambia’, PhD thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Oregon.
  3. Wolf D. 1986. ‘Factory Daughters, Their Families and Rural Industrialization in Central Java’, PhD thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca.
  4. Webb, 1984, The Social and Environmental Effects of Large Dams, 2, 120
  5. Watts, Land Tenure in Africa
  6. Watts, Manufacturing Discontent: production politics in a peasant society
  7. Watts, 1990, The Food Question
  8. Vergopolous, 1985, The end of agribusiness or the emergence of biotechnology, Journal of International Social Science, 37, 389
  9. Turton, 1984, History of Peasant Consciousness in South-east Asia, 45
  10. Scott, 1985, Weapons of the Weak: everyday f arms of peasant resistance
  11. Rodden, 1943, A Report on Rice Cultivation in The Gambia
  12. Robertson, 1987, The Dynamics of Productive Relationships: African share contracts in comparative perspective
  13. Park, 1954, Travels in the Interior of Africa
  14. 10.2307/1160760 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Moore, 1986, Space, Text and Gender: an anthropological study on the Marakwet of Kenya
  16. Moore, 1738, Travels into the Inland Parts of Africa
  17. Moock, 1986, Understanding Rural Africa's Households and Farming Systems
  18. Mintz, 1985, Sweetness and Power
  19. Medick, 1984, Interest and Emotion, 1
  20. 10.1017/S0010417500014353 · DOI
  21. 10.1111/j.1467-7660.1988.tb00313.x · DOI
  22. 10.1017/CBO9780511759796 · DOI
  23. Jones, 1986, Understanding Rural Africa's Households and Farming Systems, 105
  24. Jeng A. 1978. ‘An Economic History of The Gambian Groundnut Industry’, PhD thesis, Department of History, University of Birmingham.
  25. 10.1086/228046 · DOI
  26. 1981, Revised Appraisal Report, Jahaly and Pacharr Smallholders Project
  27. Haswell, 1963, The Changing Pattern of Economic Activity in a Gambian Village
  28. Hardcastle, 1961, A Report on a Visit to the Gambia and Senegal, 17
  29. 10.1111/j.1467-7660.1987.tb00269.x · DOI
  30. 1983, Irrigated Rice Development Project: seasonal rice cropping reports 1977–82
  31. 1981, Food Strategy Report: Part 1
  32. Sanderson, 1986, The Transformation of Mexican Agriadture: international structure and the politics of rural change, 10.1515/9781400857814 · DOI
  33. Genovese, 1974, Roll, Jordan, Roll
  34. Brenner, 1986, Analytical Marxism, 23
  35. Willis, 1981, Learning to Labor
  36. Gamble D. 1958. ‘Kerewan: An Analysis of the Economic Conditions and Underlying Factors in a Gambian Mandinka Community’, PhD thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of London.
  37. Carney, Disciplining women, Signs, 16
  38. Haswell, 1975, The Nature of Poverty
  39. Davis, 1980, The Rural Sociology of Advanced Societies: critical perspectives, 133
  40. Storper, 1986, Production, Work, Territory
  41. Weil, 1971, Papers on the Manding, 249
  42. 10.1017/S0010417500015322 · DOI
  43. Dunsmore, 1976, The Agricultural Development of the Gambia
  44. 10.1017/S0010417500014663 · DOI
  45. Okali, 1983, Cocoa and Kinship in Ghana
  46. Friedmann, 1986, Postscript, Labour, 19, 126
  47. Adanson, 1759, A Voyage to Senegal, the Isle of Goree, and the River Gambia
  48. 10.1080/00220388108421801 · DOI
  49. Carney J. 1986. ‘The Social History of Gambian Rice Production’, PhD thesis, Department of Geography, University of California, Berkeley.
  50. Burawoy, 1985, The Politics of Production
  51. 10.1093/wbro/2.2.143 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/0304-3878(86)90122-7 · DOI
  53. Berry S. 1984. ‘Households, decision-making and rural development’. Development Discussion Paper no. 167. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University, Institute for International Development.
  54. 10.1016/0305-750X(82)90084-5 · DOI
  55. Fernandes, 1951, Description de la Côte Occidentale da'Afrique
  56. 10.2307/1160762 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Foucault, 1977, Discipline and Punish
  58. 10.1007/BF00174048 · DOI
  59. Braun J. von , and Johm K. 1987. ‘Tradeoffs in the rapid expansion of smallholder rice production in The Gambia’. Paper prepared for the Conference on Cereal Consumption in West Africa, Dakar.
  60. 10.1086/451740 · DOI
  61. Clark, 1984, The Painting of Modern Life
  62. 10.1080/03066158808438366 · DOI · Paper page
  63. Bates, 1987, The agrarian origins of Mau Mau, Agricultural History, 61, 1
  64. 10.1080/03071028708567682 · DOI
  65. Certeau, 1984, The Practice of Everyday Life
  66. Berry, 1988, Land and Society in Contemporary Africa, 53
  67. 10.1016/0305-750X(86)90056-2 · DOI
  68. Foucault, 1980, Power/Knowledge
  69. Friedmann, 1979, Household economy and the national economy, Journal of Peasant Studies, 7, 159
  70. Kautsky, 1906, La Question Agraire
  71. 10.1111/j.1467-9523.1986.tb00781.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Carney, J., & Watts, M.
Venue
Africa
Published
1990-04
Volume
60
Issue
2
Pages
207-241
ISSN
  • 0001-9720
  • 1750-0184
Cited by
232
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review