The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Formal and Informal Rights to Land in Zimbabwe's Black Freehold Areas: a case-study From Msengezi
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: In 1930 the Land Apportionment Act created freehold areas exclusively for blacks, known as the ‘native purchase areas’. Forty-seven years later these sixty-six separate areas lost their legal identity when the Land Tenure Amendment Act consolidated them, and the formerly ‘European’ commercial farms, into the ‘general area’ distinct from the communally held ‘Tribal Trust Land’. Today, although the new Government has not yet touched Zimbabwe's land law, it has popularized new terms to describe these three categories: ‘rural farmers’ describes the peasantry in the communal lands; ‘small-scale commercial farmers’ locates freeholders in the former African purchase lands; and ‘large-scale commercial farmers’ are those whites– and handful of blacks – who work land in what used to be the ‘European area’. The small-scale commercial farmers, however, remain exclusively black. Thus we can talk of the African purchase lands as if they had not been affected by the Land Tenure Amendment Act of 1977.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Several recent studies of gendered land access that have examined land disputes and court cases suggest not only that women's claims to land are much more diverse, but also that women's claims to land are much stronger than usually represented”
From Policy Discourses on Women's Land Rights in Sub-Saharan Africa: The Implications of the Re-turn to the Customary (2003) · cites this paper as Cheater 1982
Citations
Cites
Custom and Politics in Urban Africa
Cohen, A. (1969) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/9780520314153 · Cited by 835
The Oxford History of South Africa
Coghlan, T., Wilson, M., & Thompson, L. (1969) · The Geographical Journal · doi:10.2307/1795128 · Cited by 574
Cheater, A. (1981) · Development and Change · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.1981.tb00805.x · Cited by 37
Self-citationSamkange, S. J. T. (1978) · Cited by 9
The production and marketing of fresh produce among Blacks in Zimbabwe
Cheater, A. (1979) · Zambezia The Journal of Humanities of the University of Zimbabwe · Cited by 4
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Rhodesia, 1968, Report of the Rural Land Board
- Elton-Mills, 1952, Land Tenure
- Rhodesia, 1976, Report of the Select Committee on Testate and Intestate Succession
- Bourdillon, 1976, The Shona Peoples
- Cheater A. P. (forthcoming). Idioms of Accumulation: Rural Development and, Class Formation Among Freeholders in Zimbabwe. Gwelo: Mambo Press.
- Fitzhenry, 1979, Kenyan squatter labour and the origins of anti-colonial revolt, Social Analysis, 3, 3
- 1965, Conference Proceedings
Cited by
Whitehead, A., & Tsikata, D. (2003) · Journal of Agrarian Change · doi:10.1111/1471-0366.00051 · Cited by 457
Introduction. Understanding African Land-Holding: Power, Wealth, and Meaning
Shipton, P., & Goheen, M. (1992) · Africa · doi:10.2307/1159746 · Cited by 118
Metadata
- Authors
- Cheater, A. P.
- Venue
- Africa
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1982-07
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 77-91
- ISSN
- 0001-9720
- 1750-0184
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 5
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Formal and Informal Rights to Land in Zimbabwe's Black Freehold Areas: a case-study From Msengezi. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1160526
- The paper
- Cheater, A. P. (1982). Formal and Informal Rights to Land in Zimbabwe's Black Freehold Areas: a case-study From Msengezi. Africa. https://doi.org/10.2307/1160526
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.