The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Student Views about Learning Math and Social Studies
Abstract
Math and social studies differ in the usual instructional pattern found in elementary classrooms, in the goals sought, and of course in the actual content. Based on documented differences in the two fields, we expected pupils to hold different ideas about how to learn each subject and to express different reasons for positive and negative experiences in each subject. Sixty fifth grade pupils from 11 classrooms were interviewed to explore their attitudes and conceptions about learning math and social studies. The interviews included pupils’ definitions of each school subject, descriptions of typical classroom activities, probes regarding how each subject was actually learned, and descriptions of times liked and disliked in each subject. Students’ conceptions and attitudes regarding math and social studies were different. Consistent with expectations, pupils characterized positive and negative experiences in math in regard to their success or ability to do the work while social studies experiences were evaluated more in terms of whether they were interesting or boring. Among other differences, more students thought they could learn social studies on their own than math.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Motivational processes affecting learning.
Dweck, C. S. (1986) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.41.10.1040 · Cited by 6,971
An analysis of learned helplessness: II. The processing of success.
Diener, C. I., & Dweck, C. S. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.39.5.940 · Cited by 533
Cited by
Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543067001088 · Cited by 3,181
Ryan, A. M., & Patrick, H. (2001) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312038002437 · Cited by 1,315
Wang, M.-T., & Degol, J. (2013) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2013.08.001 · Cited by 837
Gottfried, A. E., Fleming, J. S., & Gottfried, A. W. (2001) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.3 · Cited by 573
Children’s beliefs about intelligence and school performance
Stipek, D., & Gralinski, J. H. (1996) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.88.3.397 · Cited by 408
Metadata
- Authors
- Stodolsky, S. S., Salk, S., & Glaessner, B.
- Venue
- American Educational Research Journal
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1991
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 89
- ISSN
- 0002-8312 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2150531145
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Student Views about Learning Math and Social Studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1162880
- The paper
- Stodolsky, S. S., Salk, S., & Glaessner, B. (1991). Student Views about Learning Math and Social Studies. American Educational Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.2307/1162880
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.