Reconstructing Conceptions of Local Capacity: The Local Education Agency's Capacity for Ambitious Instructional Reform
Abstract
James P. Spillane, Charles L. Thompson, Reconstructing Conceptions of Local Capacity: The Local Education Agency's Capacity for Ambitious Instructional Reform, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Vol. 19, No. 2 (Summer, 1997), pp. 185-203
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Stress and frustration amongst teachers lead to a lack of trust in the reform.
“Other studies also indicate that stress and frustration amongst teachers lead to a lack of trust in the reform (Spillane and Thompson 1997).”
From Science education reform in Confucian learning cultures: teachers' perspectives on policy and practice in Taiwan (2018) · cites this paper as Spillane and Thompson 1997
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 31
- Authors
- Spillane, J. P., & Thompson, C. L.
- ORCID
- Spillane, James P.
- Venue
- Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1997
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 185
- ISSN
- 0162-3737 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4236516286
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 3.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Leadership and Practices
- Keywords
- local education agencies, teaching reform, organizational capacity, school district leadership
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
