Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 181

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Using Results from Replicated Studies to Estimate Linear Models

Becker, Betsy Jane·1992·Journal of Educational Statistics

Abstract

This article outlines analyses for the results of a series of studies examining intercorrelations among a set of p + 1 variables. A test of whether a common population correlation matrix underlies the set of empirical results is given. Methods are presented for estimating either a pooled or average correlation matrix, depending on whether the studies appear to arise from a single population. A random effects model provides the basis for estimation and testing when the series of correlation matrices may not share a common population matrix. Finally, I show how a pooled correlation matrix (or average matrix) can be used to estimate the standardized coefficients of a regression model for variables measured in the series of studies. Data from a synthesis of relationships among mathematical, verbal, and spatial ability measures illustrate the procedures.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1165128

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Becker, B. J.
Venue
Journal of Educational Statistics
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1992
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
341
ISSN
0362-9791 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2042257721
Cited by
181
References
0
FWCI
3.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using Results from Replicated Studies to Estimate Linear Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1165128
The paper
Becker, B. J. (1992). Using Results from Replicated Studies to Estimate Linear Models. Journal of Educational Statistics. https://doi.org/10.2307/1165128

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.